The implications of the Working Time Directive: how can paediatrics survive? | Archives of Disease in Childhood

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via RCPCH

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Responses

Leading article

The implications of the Working Time Directive: how can paediatrics survive?

Compose a Response to This Article

Compose Response

Title *

Author Information

Contributors
First Name and Middle Initial * First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'. Last Name * Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'. Email Address * Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com Occupation * Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Affiliation * Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.

Statement of Competing Interests

Competing interests? *

Yes

No

Please describe the competing interests

PLEASE NOTE:

A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.

I agree to and have read the terms and conditions for rapid responses and BMJ Privacy Notice *

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

EWTD: Different solutions for different hospitals
John Gilbert
Published on: 22 August 2007
The Working Time Direct – the next step?
Roger M Buchdahl
Published on: 10 July 2007

Published on: 22 August 2007
EWTD: Different solutions for different hospitals
- John Gilbert, Consultant Paediatrician
Dear Editor,
Campbell and Spencer have enumerated the challenges that the European Working Time Directive (EWTD) presents(1). The basis of the problem appears to be that doctors in training will have to be grouped together in larger cells with a minimum of 10 on each rota. The rationale behind this assertion is that exposure to useful training time in clinics and non- acute work will be eroded with smaller numbers...
Show More

Dear Editor,
Campbell and Spencer have enumerated the challenges that the European Working Time Directive (EWTD) presents(1). The basis of the problem appears to be that doctors in training will have to be grouped together in larger cells with a minimum of 10 on each rota. The rationale behind this assertion is that exposure to useful training time in clinics and non- acute work will be eroded with smaller numbers on a rota(2). This may well be the case in the context of a large hospital with many sub-specialist clinics and day time training opportunities, but it does not recognise the importance of learning to asses and manage the acutely ill child.
Our experience is that 62% of admissions from the Emergency Department occur outside of the normal working day. These unwell children are a precious training resource which is only of value at the time when they are assessed and managed in the acute situation. If these admissions are to provide useful training opportunities trainees must have access to appropriate supervision out of hours.
The corollary of increasing numbers on a rota is that more doctors are present during the normal working day. With 10 in a cell there will be an average of 6 doctors present during the normal working day. This is more than is needed in a smaller District General Hospital.
We have maintained a 2009 EWTD compliant middle grade rota over the last year with 7 doctors. The educational value of the training posts has been affirmed by both the College and the Deanery and this has been achieved by ensuring an appropriate level of out of hours Consultant supervision. We believe that this model should be considered when facing the challenges of the EWTD, particularly in the context of more remote District General Hospitals.
References:
1.Campbell C, Spencer SA. The Implications of the Working Time Directive: how can paediatrics survive? Arch Dis Child 2007; 92: 573-5.
2. Royal College of Physicians. Designing safer rotas for junior doctors in the 48-hour week. Report of a multidisciplinary working group. http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/pubs
Show Less

Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
- Back to top
Published on: 10 July 2007
The Working Time Direct – the next step?
- Roger M Buchdahl, Consultant Paediatrician
Dear Editor,
Colin Campbell and Stephen Spencer (1) have presented elegantly the dilemmas facing most UK paediatric units in their attempt to reduce the average hours to 48 by 2009. Their solutions include employing senior doctors as resident on call, the “hospital at night” solution , the expansion of the advanced nurse practioner grade and rationalisation of the number of units. They left out however the one so...
Show More

Dear Editor,
Colin Campbell and Stephen Spencer (1) have presented elegantly the dilemmas facing most UK paediatric units in their attempt to reduce the average hours to 48 by 2009. Their solutions include employing senior doctors as resident on call, the “hospital at night” solution , the expansion of the advanced nurse practioner grade and rationalisation of the number of units. They left out however the one solution which would avoid all the associated problems and that is to enlist the support of representive bodies such as the Royal Colleges and BMA to back a call to keep the current working time limit at 56-58 hours. Such a move would preserve the status quo in terms of the provision of more comprehensive training programmes, allow better patient care continuity and stop the relentless demand for ever increasing numbers of junior doctors many of whom have to be imported from countries who can ill afford to lose them. We are told the new Health Secretary is a listener. We need to shout loud.
Reference:
1.Campbell C, Spencer SA. The Implications of the Working Time Directive: how can paediatrics survive? Arch Dis Child 2007; 92: 573-5.
Show Less

Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
- Back to top