Responses

Download PDFPDF
Childhood obesity: should primary school children be routinely screened? A systematic review and discussion of the evidence
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Thank goodness children can be cruel

    Dear Editor,

    The childhood obesity debate continues, with polarised views from clinicians and academics (1), Ministers (2) and journalists (3). The opinion divide between clinicians (favouring case identification and ‘treatment’) and academics with public health overview (favouring primary prevention) has not been uncommon across the spectrum of health and disease. For chronic conditions like diabetes and heart dis...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.