Objectives: To gather data on the ages and weights of paediatric patients between 1 and 10 years of age, and to compare these data with the current weight estimation formula weight(kg) = 2(age+4). If a significant difference was found, the data would be used to derive a more accurate formula.
Design: Retrospective study using data collected from paediatric attendances at an emergency department (ED).
Setting: A large ED in a major UK city, treating both children and adults.
Patients: 17 244 children aged 1–10 years, attending the ED between June and December 2005.
Main outcome measures: Weight difference between the measured weight and the expected weight, the latter given by weight = 2(age+4).
Results: The weights of seriously ill children were recorded in only 41.5% of cases, necessitating a weight estimate in the remainder. The formula weight = 2(age+4) underestimated children’s weights by a mean of 18.8% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 18.42% to 19.18%). Using linear regression and analysis of each individual age group, ten new formulas were tested. Of these formulas, weight(kg) = 3(age)+7 proved the most accurate with a mean underestimate of just 2.48% (95% CI 2.17% to 2.79%).
Conclusions: Weight estimation remains of paramount importance in paediatric resuscitation. This study shows that the current estimation formula provides a significant underestimate of children’s weights. When used to calculate drug and fluid dosages, this may lead to the under-resuscitation of a critically ill child. The formula weight(kg) = 3(age)+7 provided a safe and more accurate estimate of the weight of today’s child.
- APLS, advanced paediatric life support
- 95% CI, 95% confidence interval
- ED, emergency department
- EPLS, European paediatric life support
- MAC, mid-arm circumference
- PICU, paediatric intensive care unit
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Published Online First 9 January 2007
Funding: No funds were applied for or received for this study.
Competing interests: None.