Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Was “variations of reproductive development” considered?
  1. M Simmonds
  1. Correspondence to:
    M Simmonds
    Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome Support Group, UK;

Statistics from

The new intersex terminology scheme, based on disorders of sex development (DSD) and discussed in the consensus statement by Hughes et al,1 seems to offer the following benefits:

1. It covers a wide range of intersex conditions without using the archaic and stigmatising hermaphrodite and male/female pseudo-hermaphrodite terms.

2. It should end the problem of usage of the term “intersex” by some clinicians to mean ambiguous genitalia (and being extrapolated by the media to mean sex identity problems in all cases) when it in fact includes conditions such as complete androgen insensitivity syndrome and Swyer syndrome, with a totally female phenotype.

3. It should abolish the assumption, on the part of the uninformed, that all affected people are “between the two sexes”.

4. It should reduce the …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests: None declared.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.