Responses

Download PDFPDF

Evaluation of a diphtheria–tetanus–acellular pertussis–inactivated poliovirus–Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine given concurrently with meningococcal group C conjugate vaccine at 2, 3 and 4 months of age
Free
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Misleading Vaccination Photograph

    Dear Editor,

    Re: Cover Photograph January 2007 Volume 92. No.1

    Above the caption ‘Immunogenicity of Pediacel’, the cover photograph for Archives of Disease in Childhood, January edition depicted a child (not a 2, 3 or 4 month old infant to whom Pediacel (DTaP/IPV/Hib vaccine) should be administered) (1) receiving what one assumes is a vaccine (in spite of the volume being close to 1.5mls) in the u...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.