Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Is lumbar puncture necessary for evaluation of early neonatal sepsis?
  1. B Ray, Specialist Registrar1,
  2. J Mangalore2,
  3. C Harikumar2,
  4. A Tuladhar2
  1. 1Paediatrics, Northern Deanery, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK;
  2. 2University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton, UK

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

A newborn baby born at 37 weeks is noted to be unwell at 18 h postnatally. The mother gives a history of prolonged rupture of membranes for 36 h. The baby is feeding poorly and is jittery, with a temperature of 38°C. A clinical diagnosis of early sepsis is made and lumbar puncture is suggested on the ward round as a part of sepsis evaluation. Several publications on the use of lumbar puncture in late-onset sepsis, including a recent review article by Malbon et al,1 suggest that lumbar puncture is an important method of investigation and should be considered in babies for >48 h old, with suspected sepsis.

We wonder whether there is sufficient evidence to justify lumbar puncture in early sepsis.

Structured clinical question

In a newborn (patient), is lumbar puncture (intervention) necessary to rule out meningitis in suspected sepsis (outcome) in the first few …

View Full Text


  • Bob Phillips