Download PDFPDF

Circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infection in boys: a systematic review of randomised trials and observational studies
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Don't ever forget constipation
    • A Reddy Hande, SPR paediatrics
    • Other Contributors:
      • Nick Nelhans, Consultant Paediatrician Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham

    Dear Editor,

    We read with great interest the article by D Singh-Grewal et al.[1] regarding the value of circumcision for the prevention of recurrent UTIs in boys.

    The article presents a reasonable case for considering circumcision in some boys with recurrent UTIs.

    However, we would like to bring to the authors’/readers’ attention that both the original article and the quoted papers[2] make no ment...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Breastfeeding is best for reducing UTI
    • George Hill, Executive Secretary
    • Other Contributors:
      • George C. Denniston

    To the Editor:

    Singh-Grewal et al.1 confirm earlier findings that the complications and disadvantages of male neonatal circumcision outweigh any possible health benefit and, therefore, non-circumcision produces the highest medical utility.2,3

    Unfortunately, their report on urinar...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.