Download PDFPDF

Adenotonsillectomy for upper respiratory infections: evidence based?
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Authors' reply to: Effectiveness of tonsillectomy depends on stringency of indications
    • Birgit van Staaij, General Practitioner
    • Other Contributors:
      • Maroeska Rovers, Arno Hoes, Anne Schilder

    Dear Editor

    In his letter from February 15th 2005 Dr Paradise criticises our review and raises 4 major points [1]:
    (1) he claims we overlooked previously published critiques of the controlled non-randomised trials conducted between 1920 and 1960;
    (2) we considered only pooled risk differences across studies and we thereby did not relate the outcomes to the stringency...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Duration of effect

    Dear Editor

    The authors overlook one important aspect of the effectiveness of tonsillectomy in their systematic review. This is the duration of effect. The data indicate that all children suffer fewer sore throats in the years after entry to trials - whether they are in the intervention or control group. Children undergoing surgery have fewer sore throats than those in the control group. However, the difference is...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Effectiveness of tonsillectomy depends on stringency of indications
    Dear Editor,

    The meta-analysis of adenotonsillectomy trial results reported by van Staaij and colleagues[1], from which they concluded that the operation confers “an additional, but small, reduction of sore throat episodes . . . compared to watchful waiting,” falls short on numerous counts and misleads the unwary reader.

    Their analysis of the trials conducted between the 1920s and 1960s not only overlooks prev...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.