Responses

Download PDFPDF

Preventing sleeping problems in infants who are at risk of developing them
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Preventing sleep problems: can more be done ?

    Dear Editor

    I read this article with much interest. I commend the authors on identifying a new risk factor which should help in preventing sleep problems in at-risk infants.[1]

    However, I would like to point out that the 'three step behavioural programme' used in the study [1] does not include one measure which has been shown to be successful i.e,'effectiveness of sleep routine in the prevention of sleep...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Infant sleep study - validity not clear?

    Dear Editor

    For many new parents, their baby sleeping through the night is an important milestone, so I read this study with some interest. However I was puzzled to see the background characteristics listed in table 1 belonged to the overall group of mothers and infants (as previously reported)[1] and not to the subgroup of babies reported in this study – those babies who were deemed to be ‘at-risk’ with a high...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.