Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Fertility preservation in children—scientific advances, research dilemmas, and ethics of consent
  1. GULAM BAHADUR
  1. PETER HINDMARSH
  1. DAVID RALPH
  1. Royal Free and University College Medical School and UCLH Trust
  2. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
  3. 88–96 Chenies Mews, London WC1E 6HX
  4. g.bahadur@ucl.ac.uk
  5. Department of Medicine, Paediatric Endocrinology Division
  6. Centre for Human Growth and Maturation
  7. University College London, Middlesex Hospital
  8. Mortimer St, London W1N 8AA
  9. The Institute of Urology and Nephrology (St. Peters Hospital)
  10. Middlesex Hospital, London
  1. Dr G Bahadur

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Editor,—The two publications on fertility preservation for children1 ,2 raise important issues but several issues need to be clarified.

Specifically, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is not a method to reverse male infertility in whatever circumstance. ICSI provides an effective solution to severe male infertility problem but offspring and partner issues need to be considered carefully.3-6 The suitability of pre-pubertal testicular tissue is questioned since technology surrounding cryopreservation and in vitro manipulation of prepubertal testicular tissue is stated as being “entirely experimental”. This is also true of adult testicular tissue which may similarly have immature germ cells.

The question of peripubertal boys and the use of rectal electrostimulation raises seriously important issues about the pain and psychological effect this procedure as a “first sexual experience” could have on the patients future sexual development and outlook.7 , …

View Full Text