The child with a non-blanching rash: how likely is meningococcal disease? | Archives of Disease in Childhood

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via RCPCH

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Responses

Article

The child with a non-blanching rash: how likely is meningococcal disease?

Free

Compose a Response to This Article

Compose Response

Title *

Author Information

Contributors
First Name and Middle Initial * First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'. Last Name * Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'. Email Address * Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com Occupation * Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Affiliation * Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.

Statement of Competing Interests

Competing interests? *

Yes

No

Please describe the competing interests

PLEASE NOTE:

A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.

I agree to and have read the terms and conditions for rapid responses and BMJ Privacy Notice *

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

Are there afebrile children with petechial rash who need neither investigation nor treatment?
Keith Brent
Published on: 15 October 2001
reply to Dr Rod Phillips
Nick Rutter
Published on: 11 September 2001
Petechiae or purpura in meningococcal disease
Rod Phillips
Published on: 28 August 2001

Published on: 15 October 2001
Are there afebrile children with petechial rash who need neither investigation nor treatment?
- Keith Brent, Clinical Research Fellow
Dear Editor,
Previous studies have reported on the combination of fever and rash. The paper by Wells et al [1] and the letter from Jones et al [2] are particularly valuable as they investigate afebrile children with a rash.
Jones et al had 31 patients, and none had meningococcal disease. However, Wells et al report finding 5 patients with meningococcal disease who were afebrile. May we have some clinic...
Show More

Dear Editor,
Previous studies have reported on the combination of fever and rash. The paper by Wells et al [1] and the letter from Jones et al [2] are particularly valuable as they investigate afebrile children with a rash.
Jones et al had 31 patients, and none had meningococcal disease. However, Wells et al report finding 5 patients with meningococcal disease who were afebrile. May we have some clinical details about these patients? Was their rash purely petechial? Did they appear unwell? Was there any change in their condition over the first 4-6 hours in the department?
If they had only a petechial rash, appeared well, and nothing untoward developed in 4-6 hours, then the finding of menigococcaemia would mean that the suggestion of Jones et al, that such children can be discharged without investigation or antibiotics (which is also my practice), would be called into question.
Yours sincerely,
Keith Brent
References
(1) L C Wells, J C Smith, V C Weston, J Collier, and N Rutter. The child with a non-blanching rash: how likely is meningococcal disease? Arch. Dis. Child. 2001; 85: 218-222
(2) M Jones, S Goldring and T Sajjanhar. Letter grouped with: The management of fever and petechiae: collaborative studies are needed. Arch Dis Child 2001;85:172
Show Less

Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
- Back to top
Published on: 11 September 2001
reply to Dr Rod Phillips
- Nick Rutter, Professor of Paediatric Medicine
Dear Editor,
In reply to Dr Phillips' enquiry, four of the twenty four patients with proven meningococcal disease had a petechial rash alone, with no purpura. These are the clinical details of the four:
Case 1
A 3 month old with the clinical features of meningitis. The infant was apyrexial but irritable and ill. There was a petechial rash on the trunk and upper limbs. A lumbar pu...
Show More

Dear Editor,
In reply to Dr Phillips' enquiry, four of the twenty four patients with proven meningococcal disease had a petechial rash alone, with no purpura. These are the clinical details of the four:
Case 1
A 3 month old with the clinical features of meningitis. The infant was apyrexial but irritable and ill. There was a petechial rash on the trunk and upper limbs. A lumbar puncture confirmed meningitis. CRP was 25 mg/l.
Case 2
A two year old judged on admission to have meningococcal disease. The child was apyrexial but ill, lethargic with depressed consciousness, prolonged capillary refill time and a spreading petechial rash on the trunk. CRP was 124 mg/l.
Case 3
An eight month old with fever (>38.5 oC), and a spreading rash on the the trunk and upper limbs. The infant was judged to be well on admission. CRP 26 mg/l.
Case 4
A one year old with a fever (>38.5 oC), a prolonged capillary refill time and a normal blood pressure. The infant was judged to be well on admission. There was a spreading petechial rash on the upper and lower limbs.
It was clear on admission that Cases 1 and 2 had meningococcal disease but Cases 3 and 4 were little different from those with similar features who did not have meningococcal disease. The rash was however noted to be spreading when the children were first seen.
Nick Rutter
Show Less

Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
- Back to top
Published on: 28 August 2001
Petechiae or purpura in meningococcal disease
- Rod Phillips, Paediatric skin specialist
Dear Editor,
Wells et al are to be congratulated for their paper looking at children with a non-blanching rash. The data are indeed useful. One point where further detail would be useful is the distinction between petechial and purpuric rashes. The authors initially define petechiae as...
Show More

Dear Editor,
Wells et al are to be congratulated for their paper looking at children with a non-blanching rash. The data are indeed useful. One point where further detail would be useful is the distinction between petechial and purpuric rashes. The authors initially define petechiae as <_2mm and="and" state="state" that="that" only="only" four="four" children="children" with="with" meningococcal="meningococcal" disease="disease" presented="presented" petechiae="petechiae" as="as" opposed="opposed" to="to" purpura="purpura" _="_"/>2mm). Can they provide further details of these four? Were they febrile or clearly very ill?
Some details may have been provided in the paper but the authors unfortunately used 'petechiae' synonomously with 'non-blanching' in the discussion, making interpretation a little difficult.
Rod Phillips
Show Less

Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
- Back to top