Responses

Dipstick examination for urinary tract infections
Free
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses [https://authors.bmj.com/after-submitting/rapid-responses/].
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses [https://www.bmj.com/company/journals-terms-and-conditions-for-rapid-responses/] and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice [https://www.bmj.com/company/your-privacy/].
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Re: Dipsick examination of urine

    Dear Editor,

    Our study[1] was done on a selected group of children who were at an increased risk of having urinary tract infection (UTI). The inclusion criteria were the presence of any of the following

    1. Clinical suspicion of UTI
    2. History of previous UTI or renal anomalies
    3. Children requiring antibiotics (urine culture was send prior to starting antibiotics)...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Dipstick testing of urine
    • N Sharief, Consultant Paediatrician and Head Biomedical Scientist
    • Other Contributors:
      • D Petts

    Dear Editor:

    We read with interest the letter by Thayyil-Sudhan and Gupta[1] reporting their study on the role of dipsticks in the detection of urinary tract infection in children. We believe that this is a very important subject and wish to comment on the report and their conclusions in the light of our published study.[2]

    We note that 188 urines were not sent for culture, it is not therefore possible to d...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Re: Dipstick examination for urinary tract infections: misleading analysis?

    We agree with Dr Deshpande that the sensitivity quoted for dipstick testing might not be the "true value" as a screening test for urinary tract infection as urine culture was not done on all the children in the study.

    Our study was based on the current practice at our hospital of sending urine for culture if any dipstick (nitrites, protein, leucocyte esterase or blood) was abnormal or if there was a clinical su...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Dipstick examination for urinary tract infections: misleading analysis?

    Editor,

    Thayyil-Sudhan and Gupta suggest that urine culture needs to be undertaken if any of the four indices of dipstick analysis (nitrates (sic), blood, protein or leucocyte esterase) are abnormal (1) based presumably on the high sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of this criterion. However, the design of their study wherein urine cultures were not performed on the majority of samples where dips...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.