You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Original article
Bone age assessment: a large scale comparison of the Greulich and Pyle, and Tanner and Whitehouse (TW2) methods
  1. R K Bulla,
  2. P D Edwardsa,
  3. P M Kempb,
  4. S Fryc,
  5. I A Hughesc
  1. aDepartment of Radiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK, bDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, cUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Paediatrics, Box 116, Addenbrooke’s Hospital
  1. Professor Hughes.

Abstract

PURPOSE Comparison of bone age assessed using either the “atlas matching” method of Greulich and Pyle or the “point scoring system” of Tanner and Whitehouse (TW2).

MATERIALS AND METHODS 362 consecutive “bone age” radiographs of the left hand and distal radius performed in a large provincial teaching hospital. Data were analysed using the “method comparison” statistical technique. Ten per cent of the radiographs were re-analysed to assess intra-observer variation.

RESULTS The 95% confidence interval for the difference between the two methods was 2.28 to −1.52 years. Intra-observer variation was greater for the Greulich and Pyle method than for the TW2 method (95% confidence limit, −2.46 to 2.18 v −1.41 to 1.43).

CONCLUSION The two methods of bone age assessment as used in clinical practice do not give equivalent estimates of bone age and we suggest that one method only (preferably the TW2) should be used when performing serial measurements on an individual patient.

  • bone age
  • Greulich and Pyle
  • Tanner and Whitehouse

https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.81.2.172

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes