Article Text

Systematic review of the school entry medical examination
  1. SONYA LEFF
  1. CCP South Downs Health NHS Trust
  2. Peacehaven Clinic, Peacehaven BN10 8BN, UK

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Editor,—This important review of the school entry medical (SEM) examination1 is so flawed that the key messages cannot be supported. The School Health Service was introduced as a therapeutic, not just an epidemiological tool, when the Boer War revealed the extent of untreated disease for which neither treatment nor care was available. In 1976, the Court Report recommended that the SEM should be a statutory examination: not to identify missed disease, but to support needy children, because of the profound impact of indifferent health, disadvantage, and developmental delay on educational progress. The Polnay Report, Health needs of school age children (1995), clearly advised that the health care assessment by school nurses at entry should also advance health promotion.

    School health varies dramatically …

    View Full Text