Responses

Download PDFPDF
Near-fatal and fatal asthma and air pollution: are we missing an opportunity to ask key questions?
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    We have a responsibility to discuss and record the detrimental health effects of air pollution
    • Heather J Lambert, Paediatrician and research associate 1. University of Newcastle upon Tyne 2. Ride For Their Lives
    • Other Contributors:
      • Mark J Hayden, Consultant Paediatric Intensivist
      • Chinthika Piyasena, Consultant Neonatologist
      • Stephen W Lord, Consultant Cardiologist and Medical Examiner

    Varghese and colleagues draw attention to and argue for better capture of the link between air pollution and fatal or near-fatal asthma at a patient level [1]

    Evidence on the detrimental effects of air pollution on health have led to the World Health Organisation proposing stringent targets in guidelines for improving air quality [2,3], which in the UK we fall far short of [4].
    There is a clear mismatch: if air pollution is a major risk for 5 million excess deaths per year globally and 30-40 thousand excess deaths in the UK [5], why is that risk rarely discussed in clinical consultations or documented in clinical records? We frequently ask about smoking and pets in the household when taking a clinical history, but not about outdoor air pollution exposure in terms of where children live or how they walk to school in relation to local busy roads.

    In 2020 the result of an inquest linked the death of a 9 year old girl, to air pollution based on careful examination of timing of admissions and spikes in air pollution over the preceding years. The coroner rightly criticised many professional groups. This included those responsible for medical education for failing to focus on air pollution and clinicians for failing to warn this girl’s family about the health risks of air pollution [6].

    So despite the considerable scientific evidence, air pollution is seldom recorded clinically. It has a code that is rarely used (Exposure to air pollution ICD10 Co...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.