You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Archimedes
Can physiotherapy alone reduce spinal curvature in patients with idiopathic scoliosis?
  1. Faris Khan,
  2. Lucy Chinnery,
  3. Jacob Loveridge
  1. School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  1. Correspondence to Mr Faris Khan, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK; 1fariskhan{at}gmail.com

https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2022-325101

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    A 13-year-old boy is seen in his first orthopaedic clinic visit due to a growing angle of curvature of his spine (Cobb angle of 25°). His mother is concerned about the long-term effects of spinal surgery on his growth, and the boy is unwilling to use an uncomfortable brace. Since the boy is still physically active and mobile, you wonder if effective and targeted physiotherapy at an early stage would be sufficient in controlling the boy’s idiopathic scoliosis and help improve his quality of life. This could include minimising pain and limiting the impact of the boy’s condition on his mental health.

    Structured clinical question

    Can physiotherapy alone (intervention) reduce spinal curvature (outcome) in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (patient/condition)?

    Search strategy and outcome

    • Cochrane Library search in March 2022 with the terms “idiopathic scoliosis” yielded 9 results, 2 of which were relevant.

    • PubMed search with the terms “Exercise”[Mesh] AND “Scoliosis”[Mesh]. This search was filtered to include only randomised control trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews (SRs), yielding 18 results, 5 of which were relevant.

    • NHS Evidence search for “idiopathic scoliosis” AND “exercise” yielded 55 results, 9 of which were relevant.

    • Three systematic reviews have been included in this critical appraisal, consisting of 30 primary studies (28 unique studies, 2 studies are included twice in different systematic reviews,1 2 duplicate studies account for 9.3% of the information). These reviews are summarised in Table 1.

    View this table:
    • In this window
    • In a new window
    Table 1

    Commentary

    Prompt management of AIS is …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Contributors FK conducted the literature search, interpreted results, drafted the manuscript and edited through multiple revisions. LC and JL interpreted results, contributed to the manuscript and edited through multiple revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles