Article Text
PDF
Statistics from Altmetric.com
A male adolescent was a restrained passenger in a high-speed road traffic collision. At the scene he was noted to be hypotensive and received one unit of blood. In the emergency department, he presented with mild chest pain. He had a normal chest examination. A 20 mm Hg blood pressure difference was found between his right and left arms. His CT chest is displayed in figure 1.
CT chest with contrast, axial 3 mm slice taken just below the level of the subclavian artery origin.
Questions
What is the most likely cause of the CT appearance identified by arrow ‘C’?
Pneumothorax
Haemothorax
Empyema
Pulmonary contusion
What does the arrow ‘B’ show?
Aortic dissection
Aortic transection
Normal anatomy
Cardiac tamponade
How would you manage this patient acutely?
When would you decide to organise a CT chest in a trauma patient?
Answers
Question 1
(B) Haemothorax. Arrow ‘C’ demonstrates fluid within the pleural space; in a trauma setting, blood must be suspected. Air (pneumothorax) appears black on a CT and an empyema (purulent collection) is not in keeping with the clinical case. In trauma, haemothorax occurs from injury to the lungs, heart, chest wall or great vessels.
Question 2
(B) Aortic transection. Arrow ‘B’ demonstrates mural irregularity of the aorta with a pseudoaneurysm anteriorly, implying complete disruption of the vessel wall—an aortic transection. This location, the aortic isthmus, is the most common site for this injury.
Additional findings labelled as arrow ‘A’ show a mediastinal haematoma.
In aortic dissection there is an intimal tear allowing blood to pool between vessel layers (figure 2).1 2 On CT, dissection is evident as an intimal flap leading to a blood-filled space with a true and false lumen.3
Classification system for traumatic aortic injury. Reproduced from Azizzadeh et al 1 with permission from Elsevier.
A high index of clinical suspicion is required to diagnose aortic injury and should be considered in rapid deceleration mechanisms, patients with signs of a chest injury and/or haemodynamic instability.4
Question 3
Follow the ‘C-ABC’ approach to trauma with administration of tranexamic acid, volume resuscitation with blood products and activation of the major haemorrhage protocol as required. Avoid hypertension which may exacerbate the aortic injury.5
Definitive treatment requires mutli disciplinary team input from general paediatric surgeons, cardiothoracic surgeons, vascular surgeons and interventional radiology. Minor aortic injuries may be managed conservatively with follow-up imaging but more significant vessel injury requires repair (open vs endovascular).6 In this case, the patient was managed with an open repair by cardiothoracics and made a full recovery.
Question 4
Imaging in the paediatric population is guided by the as low as reasonably achievable principle, aiming to limit unnecessary radiation exposure. Reassuringly, there is no difference in mortality outcomes when targeted imaging is compared with the ‘pan-scan’ approach.7
The Royal College of Radiology published recommendations specific to paediatric trauma.8 In thoracic injury, chest X-rays should be performed initially to look for mediastinal enlargement, rib fractures, haemothorax/pneumothorax and diaphragmatic injury. If the patient is stable, with no signs of chest trauma and a normal X-ray, no further imaging is recommended. Conversely, in the patients with chest signs (abnormal examination or observations), abnormal chest X-ray and who are unstable without obvious cause, further imaging of the chest should be considered. Contrast-enhanced CT is the modality of choice.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Footnotes
Contributors MGWM, JAC and SM collectively managed the case and discussed the idea of sharing their learning. SM provided the manuscript framework and supervised throughout the process. NC provided the CT images.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.