Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Letter
Lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic: impact on infants with pyloric stenosis
Free
  1. Paediatric Surgery Trainee Research Network1,
  2. Felicity Arthur2,
  3. Rachel Harwood3,
  4. Benjamin Allin4,
  5. George Stephen Bethell5,
  6. Tristan Boam6,
  7. Sumita Chhabra7,
  8. Mary Patrice Eastwood8,
  9. Kathryn Ford9,
  10. Hannah Rhodes10,
  11. Sesi Hotonu11,
  12. Aileen Rooney12,
  13. Jennifer Billington13,
  14. Joseph Rutherford Davidson14,
  15. Greg Dewar10,
  16. Ciaran Durand8,
  17. Nick Engall15,
  18. Patrick Green3,
  19. Matthew Jobson16,
  20. Anthony Starr17,
  21. Lucinda GC Tullie18
  22. PSTRN Collaborative Group
    1. 1 Collaborative Trainee Research Group, Paediatric Surgery Trainees, UK, UK
    2. 2 Paediatric Surgery, Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow, UK
    3. 3 Paediatric Surgery, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
    4. 4 Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
    5. 5 University Surgery Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
    6. 6 Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, Norfolk, UK
    7. 7 Paediatric Surgery, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK
    8. 8 Paediatric Surgery, Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast, UK
    9. 9 Paediatric Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
    10. 10 Department of Paediatric Surgery, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK
    11. 11 Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK
    12. 12 Paediatric Surgery, Glasgow Children's Hospital Charity, Glasgow, UK
    13. 13 St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
    14. 14 Paediatric Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
    15. 15 Paediatric Surgery, Manchester Children's Hospitals, Manchester, UK
    16. 16 Paediatric Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
    17. 17 Paediatric Surgery, Morecambe Bay Health Authority, Manchester, UK
    18. 18 Specialist Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
    1. Correspondence to Miss Felicity Arthur, Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow G51 4TF, UK; felicity.arthur2{at}ggc.scot.nhs.uk

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    The COVID-19 pandemic has posed challenges for the delivery of healthcare for infants with disruption to 6-week health checks and health visitor services.1 An area of particular concern is late presentation to the hospital.2 However, current data do not offer an objective picture of how significant a problem this may be, with other reports showing low rates of delays in presentation.3 Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) is a common, non-infective infantile condition with a predictable clinical course and therefore a good indicator condition to assess for delays in presentation. We aimed to assess whether infants with IHPS presented later during ‘lockdown’ compared with the same period the preceding year.

    Ten centres within the UK (England, Scotland and Northern Ireland) contributed data from babies with IHPS via a website (covidinchildren.co.uk) between 23 March 2020 and 31 May 2020 (the COVID-19 lockdown period) and between 23 March and 31 May 2019 (controls). A total of 87 eligible infants were included, comprising 40 controls (46%) and 47 cases (54%). The demographic and baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar (table 1 and figure 1).

    Table 1

    Characteristics of control (2019 patients) and lockdown (2020) patients

    Figure 1

    Comparison between the age at presentation (A) and admission weight (B) of infants with IHPS in the control period (2019) and the lockdown period. No significant difference is seen between the two groups (age at admission p=0.64, admission weight p=0.84). IHPS, Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

    Median age and weight at presentation in the control group were 31 days (24–41) and 3600 g (3190–4081), and those in the lockdown group were 34 days (26–41) and 3580 g (3120–4085). These differences were not statistically significant (p=0.64, p=0.84) (figure 1). The change in standardised weight loss was also comparable. (table 2). Patients requirement for preoperative intensive care and serum biochemistry was also similar except the lockdown group had a statistically but not clinically significant higher serum potassium (4.16 vs 4.5 mmol/L, p=0.04) (table 2).

    Table 2

    Comparison of the primary and secondary outcome measures for infants presenting during the lockdown and control periods

    As an indicator condition, we have some reassurance that infants with IHPS have not had a significantly delayed presentation due to the COVID-19 lockdown. A recent objective study looking at paediatric presentations to emergency departments found very low numbers of delayed presentations to the hospital, with minimal associated morbidity.3 4 Prompt, proactive changes to National Health Service 111 algorithms, guidance for parents by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health5 and the rapid uptake of virtual general practice and health visitor consultations may have avoided morbidity. Further work, focusing on different types of conditions, or different subsections of society will help provide useful information relating to the impact of societal lockdown on healthcare-seeking behaviour in the UK and will enable more effective delivery of healthcare provision and public messaging in the event of further lockdowns.

    Ethics statements

    References

    Footnotes

    • Twitter @RachelHarwood10, @PaedSurgJoe

    • Collaborators PSTRN Collaborative Group: writing group: BA, FA, GB and RH. PSTRN Committee: BA, FA, GB, TB, SC, MPE, KF, RH, HR, SH and AR.

    • Contributors Writing group: BA, FA, GSB and RH. PSTRN committee: BA, FA, GSB, TB, SC, MPE, KF, RH, HR, SH and AR. Data contributors: FA, GSB, JB, TB, JRD, CD, GD, MPE, NE, PG, SH, MJ, AS and LGCT.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.