Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Letter
Changing admission patterns in paediatric emergency departments during the COVID-19 pandemic
Free
  1. Andrea Scaramuzza1,
  2. Francesco Tagliaferri2,
  3. Lorenza Bonetti1,
  4. Martina Soliani1,
  5. Francesco Morotti2,
  6. Simonetta Bellone2,
  7. Claudio Cavalli1,
  8. Ivana Rabbone2
  1. 1 Pediatrics, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale di Cremona, Cremona, Italy
  2. 2 Pediatrics, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Dr Andrea Scaramuzza, Pediatrics, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale di Cremona, 26100 Cremona, Italy; a.scaramuzza{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

On 20 February 2020, so-called Italian Patient 1 was admitted to the intensive care unit of his local hospital due to a deteriorating clinical condition from SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 infection.

In Italy, COVID-19 originated from a handful of small towns in northern Italy that were swiftly placed into lockdown. Lockdown of Milan, Venice, Rimini and their provinces and neighbouring towns and cities followed on 8 March and the whole of Italy on 9 March, when the ‘#stayhome’ (#iostoacasa) executive order was issued. This order remained in place until after Easter, with all public gatherings banned and travel only allowed for ‘urgent, verifiable work situations and emergencies or health reasons’.

As of 30 March, 101 739 COVID-19 cases have been confirmed in Italy. This number includes the deceased (n=11 591) as well as those who have recovered (n=14 620). These cases have been identified through 477 359 tests on people experiencing suspicious symptoms, the most widespread testing in Europe.

We would like to present data from two towns in northern Italy, Cremona (72 680 inhabitants), in the real middle of the Italian COVID-19 epidemics, and Novara (104 268 inhabitants), close to Lombardy. In the pediatrics unit in Cremona, 8 out of 58 tests have been positive to date. Six of these cases have been admitted to hospital for mild or moderate symptoms, representing 13.8% of children tested versus 21.3% of patients in the general population. In Novara pediatrics department, only 4 out of 10 children were positive (40%) for COVID-19, and only 1 was admitted to hospital.

During the current pandemic, we have witnessed a drastic decrease in admissions to our emergency departments (EDs) (table 1). In Cremona, there was a 76% decrease in the number of patients under 15 years admitted to the ED between the first day COVID-19 was recognised as a health problem in our region until 30 March (40 days of observation) compared with the same period in 2019. A similar trend has been observed in Novara (664 versus 1749 patients, a 64% decrease).

Table 1

Admissions data for children under 15 years of age attending the Cremona and Novara paediatric emergency departments during the COVID-19 pandemic between 20 February 2020 and 30 March 2020 compared with the same period in 2019

Why has this significant decrease in paediatric admissions occurred? While possible reasons include fear of COVID-19 or a reduction in other seasonal infections due to self-isolation, robustly answering this question is of paramount importance. Revealingly, the significant decrease in white codes at both EDs with a significant increase in green codes suggests that most of the non-relevant pathologies usually seen at our EDs have been avoided. ED overcrowding is a global problem that has a massive organisational and fiscal impact, hampering the ability to provide critical services to patients suffering from medical emergencies in a timely manner in at-capacity or overcapacity departments. After the COVID-19 pandemic has resolved, the best way to disincentivise inappropriate use of the EDs will require serious consideration. Possible solutions might include education about medical necessity for inappropriate users, expansion of the prehospital role of primary care and inappropriate use prevention and improved access to alternative healthcare services.

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Twitter @andreathedoc

  • Contributors AS and IR were responsible for the study design. All authors were responsible to conduct the study and data collection. IR and AS ran the data analysis and interpreted data. IR and AS wrote the manuscript and all authors read the paper and contributed to discussion.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles