Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Educational attainment in childhood cancer survivors: a meta-analysis
  1. Defne Saatci,
  2. Andrew Thomas,
  3. Beverley Botting,
  4. Alastair G Sutcliffe
  1. General and Adolscent Paediatric Unit, Institute of Child Health, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Defne Saatci, Population Policy Practice, Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK; defne.saatci.16{at}ucl.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective To assess differences across educational outcomes in survivors of childhood cancer (CCS) compared with peers.

Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Data sources and study selection Medline, EMBASE, ERIC, CINAHL and PsycInfo from inception to 1st August 2018. Any peer reviewed, comparative study with a population of any survivor of childhood cancer, from high-economy countries, reporting outcomes on educational attainment, were selected.

Results 26 studies representing 28 434 CCS, 17 814 matched controls, 6582 siblings and six population studies from 11 high-income countries, which have similar access to education and years of mandatory schooling as reported by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, were included. CCS were more likely to remain at compulsory level (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.43) and less likely to complete secondary (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.0) and tertiary level education (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.98). They were more likely to require special educational needs (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.91 to 3.20). Subgroup analyses revealed that survivors, irrespective of central nervous system (CNS) involvement, were less likely to progress onto secondary level compared with cancer-free peers (OR 1.77. 95% CI 1.46 to 2.15; OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.42, respectively). This, however, changed at tertiary level where those with CNS involvement continued to perform worse (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.68) but those without appeared to perform similarly to their peers (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.25).

Conclusions Compared with controls, we have elucidated significant differences in educational attainment in survivors. This is sustained across different countries, making it an international issue. CNS involvement plays a key role in educational achievement. Clinicians, teachers and policymakers should be made aware of differences and consider advocating for early educational support for survivors.

  • childhood cancer survivors
  • paediatric cancer
  • academic achievement
  • school performance
  • educational outcomes
  • special educational needs
  • meta-analysis
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors DS and AGS conceptualised and designed the study, analysed data, and drafted as well as revised the manuscript. AT and BB were involved in the design of the study and revision of the manuscript.

  • Funding Financial Support from University College London.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data are available upon reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Atoms
    Nick Brown