Responses

Download PDFPDF
Images in paediatrics
Tricky case of Takayasu arteritis in a young child presenting with heart failure and femoral pulses
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Is it really Takayasu arteritis or could it be fibromuscular dysplasia?
    • Kjell Tullus, Consultant Paediatric Nephrologist Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children

    Fabi et al presented in the recent issue of Archives in Diseases in Childhood a 6 year old girl with left renal artery stenosis, occlusion of the right renal artery and narrowed aorta.1 The vascular diagnosis in the child was done very accurately with percutaneous angiography and she also received successful treatment with angioplasty. I would very much support the author’s opinion on the anatomical diagnosis and how it was treated.
    I would however like to challenge their primary diagnoses of this child. They choose to call this Takaysu Arteritis (TA). I would suggest that fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) or a genetic syndrome like Neurofibromatosis type 1 or Williams’s syndrome is much more likely.2 The angiographic appearances of all these conditions can be indistinguishable.3;4 It is however true that this child, as does all our children in our large renovascular service at Great Ormond Street Hospital, fulfil the published criteria for Takayasu.5 This is actually a very big problem as these conditions very often get confused with each other.
    I would argue that you will need something more for the TA diagnosis. This can be a convincing history and blood parameters of a systemic vasculitis. It could also be that imaging shows a thickened aortic wall or uptake on a PET scan suggestive of vascular inflammation.6;7 Without any such findings I suggest that it is wiser to label this child as having FMD. We have seen several cases where children have been diagnosed...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.