Why is there a multi-fold difference in diagnosis of abuse among infants with long bone fracture in East Anglia compared with Sweden? | Archives of Disease in Childhood

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via RCPCH

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Article info

Postscript

Letter

Why is there a multi-fold difference in diagnosis of abuse among infants with long bone fracture in East Anglia compared with Sweden?

Authors

Ulf Högberg Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden PubMed articles Google scholar articles
Jacob Andersson Forensic Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden PubMed articles Google scholar articles
Göran Högberg Formerly Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Unit, Deparment of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden PubMed articles Google scholar articles
Ingemar Thiblin Forensic Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden PubMed articles Google scholar articles

Correspondence to Professor Ulf Högberg; ulf.hogberg{at}kbh.uu.se

Citation

Högberg U, Andersson J, Högberg G, et al

Why is there a multi-fold difference in diagnosis of abuse among infants with long bone fracture in East Anglia compared with Sweden?

Archives of Disease in Childhood 2019;104:1122.

Publication history

Accepted May 6, 2019
First published June 4, 2019.

Online issue publication

October 18, 2019

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.