Objective Vein of Galenaneurysmal malformation (VGAM) is a rare but important congenital malformation presenting to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), and with a change from surgical to endovascular management, survival for this condition has improved. However, there is little reported about the medical management decisions of infants with this condition and the associated long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. We aim to report a single centre experience of both acute treatment and long-term outcomes of VGAM for those infants admitted to our NICU soon after birth.
Design Retrospective cohort study over a 15-year period from 2001 to 2015 inclusive.
Setting A quaternary NICU at The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Participants 24 newborn infants referred for management of VGAM. There were no eligibility criteria set for this study; all presenting infants were included.
Main outcomes measures Clinical neuroimaging data were gathered. Surviving children were formally assessed with a battery of tests administered by a neuropsychologist and occupational therapist/physiotherapist at various ages across early to middle childhood.
Results Fifteen neonates with VGAM did not survive beyond their NICU admission. 10 of these were not offered endovascular intervention. Of the nine surviving infants, only one had a normal neurodevelopmental outcome.
Conclusions The mortality of VGAM presenting in the neonatal period was high, and rates of normal neurodevelopmental outcome for survivors were low. These findings contribute to our understanding of which neonates should be treated and highlights the importance of providing clinical neurodevelopmental follow-up to survivors beyond their infant years.
- vein of Galen malformation
- neurodevelopmental outcome
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Contributors SM, ACB and AW data collection and interpretation, manuscript preparation. JKG research conceptualisation, data collection and manuscript preparation. TMP research conceptualisation and manuscript preparation. PM and AW data interpretation and manuscript preparation. RH research conceptualisation and design, data interpretation and manuscript preparation.
Funding The following research was funded through The Royal Children’s Hospital Foundation.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement Unpublished data have not been made available to persons outside the research team.
Patient consent for publication Obtained.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.