Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Impact of acute otitis media clinical practice guidelines on antibiotic and analgesic prescriptions: a systematic review
  1. Yelin Deniz1,
  2. Rick T van Uum1,
  3. Marieke L A de Hoog1,
  4. Anne G M Schilder1,2,
  5. Roger A M J Damoiseaux1,
  6. Roderick P Venekamp1
  1. 1 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  2. 2 evidENT, Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Rick T van Uum, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3508 GA, The Netherlands; R.T.vanUum-2{at}umcutrecht.nl

Abstract

Background Clinical practice guidelines focusing on judicious use of antibiotics for childhood acute otitis media (AOM) have been introduced in many countries around the world.

Objective To systematically review the effects of these guidelines on the prescription of antibiotics and analgesics for children with AOM.

Methods Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library from inception to 6 June 2017 using broad search terms. Studies specifically aimed at evaluating the effects of introduction of national AOM practice guidelines on type of antibiotic and/or analgesic prescriptions were included, irrespective of design, setting or language. The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool was used to assess risk of bias.

Results Of 411 unique records retrieved, seven studies conducted in six different countries (France, Italy, Spain, Sweden, UK and USA (twice)) compared data before and after guideline introduction. All studies had an observational design, using longitudinal data of children aged under 15 years (n=200–4.6 million) from either routine care, insurance databases or electronic surveys. Risk of bias of all studies was judged serious to critical.

Of the five studies reporting on antibiotic prescription rates, three showed a decline of 5%–12% up to 3 years after guideline introduction and two found no or negligible effect. In one US study, the initial 9% decline decreased to 5% after 4–6 years. The recommended first choice antibiotic was prescribed more frequently (9%–58% increase) after guideline introduction in four out of five studies reporting on this outcome. Analgesic prescription rates for AOM were reported in one US study and increased from 14% to 24% after guideline introduction.

Conclusion Based upon what is published, the effects of introduction of national clinical practice guidelines on antibiotic and analgesic prescribing for children with AOM seem modest at the most.

Registration PROSPERO: CRD42016050976.

  • acute otitis Media
  • aom
  • guidelines
  • antibiotics
  • analgesics

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • YD and RTU contributed equally.

  • Contributors YD, RTvU and RPV collected and reviewed primary data. YD and RTvU drafted the first version of the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript and accepted the final manuscript for publication.

  • Funding This review was supported by a grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw)—HGOG subprogramme.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.