Importance Children with neurodevelopmental disorders have a higher prevalence of sleep disturbances. Currently there is variation in the use of melatonin; hence, an up-to-date systematic review is indicated to summarise the current available evidence.
Objective To determine the efficacy and safety of melatonin as therapy for sleep problems in children with neurodevelopmental disorders.
Data sources and study selections PubMed, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception up to January 2018. Two reviewers performed data assessment and extraction. We assessed randomised controlled trials that compared melatonin with placebo or other intervention for the management of sleep disorders in children (<18 years) with neurodevelopmental disorders.
Data extraction and synthesis We identified 3262 citations and included 13 studies in this meta-analysis.
Main outcomes Main outcomes included total sleep time, sleep onset latency, frequency of nocturnal awakenings and adverse events.
Results Thirteen randomised controlled trials (n=682) met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of nine studies (n=541) showed that melatonin significantly improved total sleep time compared with placebo (mean difference (MD)=48.26 min, 95% CI 36.78 to 59.73, I2=31%). In 11 studies (n=581), sleep onset latency improved significantly with melatonin use (MD=−28.97, 95% CI −39.78 to −18.17). No difference was noted in the frequency of nocturnal awakenings (MD=−0.49, 95% CI −1.71 to 0.73). No medication-related serious adverse event was reported.
Conclusion Melatonin appeared safe and effective in improving sleep in the studied children. The overall quality of the evidence is limited due to heterogeneity and inconsistency. Further research is needed.
- paediatric practice
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors ISA, AKA conceived the systematic review’s aims and design. ISA, MAG contributed to the systematic review data assessment and extraction. ISA performed the data analysis and drafted the manuscript. ISA, MAG, AKA performed the interpretation of the results, review of the manuscript and approval of the submitted version of the review.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. This research is not funded by specific grant from any funding agency. NA
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement Data extraction form and protocol available by request at email@example.com.