Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Archimedes summary
Structured clinical question
In children (1 month to 18 years) outside the neonatal age range presenting with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), does thrombolysis help improve neurological outcome? If so, within what time frame does this need to occur in order to be effective?
Outcome of evidence search
Thrombolysis is not clearly of benefit in children presenting with AIS.
Scenario
A previously fit and well 12-year-old girl presents to accident and emergency (A&E) in the middle of the night with an acute-onset left-sided hemiparesis. She was last seen well before bed 3 hours ago. The clinical impression is that she has had a cerebro-vascular accident secondary to an acute ischaemic insult. An urgent out of hours CT head is carried out, which shows ‘hypodense changes in the region of the right middle cerebral artery’. Your A&E colleagues state that they thrombolyse adult patients presenting like this. Do you proceed to thrombolyse this young girl?
Structured clinical question
In children (1 month to 18 years) outside the neonatal age range (patient group) presenting with AIS (condition), does thrombolysis (intervention) help improve neurological outcome (outcome)? If so, within what time frame does this need to occur in order to be effective?
Search strategy
Primary sources
Medline through PubMed was searched using the search strategy given below:
MEDLINE stroke.ti,ab [Limit to: (Age Groups All Child 0–18 years) and (Languages English)] AND (thrombolysis OR thrombolytic AND agent OR alteplase OR …
Footnotes
Contributors Both the authors contributed equally for the development of this article. The final editing and submission was done by DB.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.