Frequency and aetiology of hypercalcaemia
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Re:Hypercalcaemia and neonatal sepsis

    The purpose of our study was to document the prevalence of hypercalcaemia in children and its possible associations and we agree with the correspondent that it would be helpful to confirm these associations, such as the one highlighted for sepsis, thorough more detailed and rigorous studies.

    Conflict of Interest:

    None declared

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Hypercalcaemia and neonatal sepsis

    Dear Sir,

    McNeilly et al. (1) recently reported the results of their 5 year retrospective study detailing frequency and aetiology of hypercalcaemia in children (defined as total calcium >2.90mmol/l). Of those with sustained hypercalcaemia (elevated levels for >2 consecutive days), neonates were over-represented (42%), and suspected sepsis was the single most common cause (24%). The authors hypothesis regar...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.