Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
You are caring for a 7-year-old boy with group A streptococcal (GAS) toxic shock syndrome (TSS). You wonder whether his parents and siblings are at increased risk for invasive GAS disease and whether chemoprophylaxis should be considered.
Structured clinical question
Are close household contacts (population) of a patient with community-acquired invasive GAS disease at higher risk of invasive GAS disease (outcome) than the general population (comparator)?
Search strategy and outcome
PubMed, Medline (OVID, 1946–present) and EMBASE (OVID, 1974–present) databases were searched using the following structure: (group A streptococc* OR streptococcus pyogenes OR beta haemolytic streptococc* OR beta hemolytic streptococc*) AND (sepsis OR bacteraemia OR bacteremia OR septicaemia OR septicemia OR invasive OR necroti* OR toxic shock) AND (*prophylaxis OR prophylactic OR prevent* OR contact OR household OR family OR secondary OR subsequent). Limits set: human, English language. This produced 860 matches. After excluding studies related to outbreaks in nosocomial or institutional settings, and community clusters, we identified four prospective population-based studies that investigated the risk of secondary invasive GAS disease in household contacts (table 1).1–4 Additional data from surveillance by Davies et al were available in a secondary publication.5 The references of these manuscripts were hand-searched and no further relevant publications were identified.
Invasive GAS disease is defined by the isolation of Streptococcus pyogenes from a sterile site and comprises TSS, necrotising fasciitis, bacteraemia and focal infections such as osteomyelitis.6 ,7 It causes significant morbidity, with overall mortality between 8% and 16% and …
Contributors JPC conducted the search and prepared the manuscript and tables. AS, NC and PRS were involved in planning the study, interpreting results and editing through multiple revisions. All authors gave approval for submission of this manuscript.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.