Responses

Download PDFPDF
Growth and nutrition in children with ataxia telangiectasia
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Re: Conclusions not justified by findings
    • Jayesh M Bhatt, Consultant Respiratory Paediatrician Nottingham Children's Hospital, National Paediatric Ataxia Telangiectasia Clinic, QMC, Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK

    Dear Editor,

    We thank Professor Wright for her comments, and we welcome the opportunity to provide some clarification and further analysis. 

    We reported Z-scores rather than percentiles, although some comments on approximate percentiles can be made.  Assuming that Z scores of -1.96 and -3 represent approximately the 2.5th and 0.2nd centiles respectively, 36/101 children were below the 2.5th centile, and 17/101 were below the 0.2nd centile for weight.  Additionally, our mixed effects model (accounting for multiple measurements) modelling the group trend over time estimated the mean weight Z score at 11 years to be -1.63 (approximately 5th centile). 

    Despite the overall short stature of the group, 24/101 children had a BMI Z score of less than -1.96.  So, by this approach, their weight was low even after taking into account stature.  We agree that we cannot infer causality from this observational study, but we believe a proportion of the stunted growth is explained by low weight. We are exploring other measures of malnutrition, such as skin-fold thickness. 

    Whilst our patient numbers are small, they do give some weight to the argument that PEG feeding halts the progression of malnutrition.  We investigated the rate of decline of weight after PEG insertion.  In a mixed effects model with a random intercept for individual patients, the rate of wei...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Conclusions not justified by findings
    It is encouraging to see a clinical service making an effort to examine the patterns of growth found in their condition. However the conclusions drawn from their data seem greatly overstated. They describe a pattern of 'progressive growth failure' in nearly a quarter of children with ataxia telangiectasia (AT), yet there is an average decline across all children of less than half a centile space over 3 years. These children are...
    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.