Responses

Download PDFPDF
Aortic dissection in children and adolescents with Turner syndrome: risk factors and management recommendations
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Cardiac MRI screening in Turner syndrome: less may be more
    • Paul E. Kahlke, Senior Pediatrics Resident
    • Other Contributors:
      • Elizabeth Cummings

    We read with interest Turtle and colleagues recommendations on screening for and management of aortic dissection (AD) in Turner syndrome (TS)[1]. The authors recommend multiple pediatric cardiac MRIs for girls with TS, but do not discuss the costs, harms, or effectiveness of such a program. The cost of at least two to three cardiac MRIs for low risk girls alone would be high, but could be much higher if extra clinical fol...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.