Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Infant sleep-related deaths: why do parents take risks?
  1. Lane E Volpe1,2,
  2. Helen L Ball2,3
  1. 1The Implementation Group, Boulder, Colorado, USA
  2. 2Parent-Infant Sleep Lab, Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, UK
  3. 3Wolfson Research Institute for Health & Wellbeing, Durham University, Durham, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Lane E Volpe, Parent-Infant Sleep Lab, Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK; Lane{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Despite significant reductions in infant sleep-related deaths, they continue to be a leading cause of infant mortality and further reductions have proven difficult to achieve compared with the initial dramatic reductions brought about by Back to Sleep campaigns. Because night-time caregiving behaviours and infant sleep environments involve a complex interplay between environmental, biological and behavioural variables, designing effective interventions to improve sleep-related outcomes represents a significant public health challenge.

Hayman and colleagues1 present data on infant suffocation deaths involving wedging or overlay in the sleep environment which occurred in New Zealand between 2002 and 2009. They examine the scenarios which resulted in sleep-related infant mortality and which may be used to refine existing paediatric recommendations. The authors claim that their data reinforce the need for ‘consistent, persistent’ safe sleep messages which are disseminated widely. However, this type of authoritative health promotion has been critiqued and other models for delivering negotiated, individualistic messages are considered to be more effective where complex behaviours are involved.

With regard to infant sleep safety, message exposure and awareness of sleep-related risk factors represents only one possible reason why sleep-related risks to infants exist. Furthermore, a singular focus on message delivery inhibits the very types of conversations with healthcare providers that are necessary for parents to engage in contingency planning. In many cases, healthcare providers are not well prepared for conversations with parents who cannot or will not comply with recommended practices. Situations which require contingency planning and challenge parents to know how to transfer recommendations to different sleeping arrangements than the one …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests HLB was a topic specific member of the NICE Guidance Update Panel. The Infant Safe Sleep Tool described in this editorial was conducted as part of a consultancy she was contracted to undertake for Blackpool and North Lancashire NHS Trusts. LEV serves as a member of the Colorado Infant Safe Sleep Partnership (USA), a state-wide partnership that is coordinated by the Child Fatality Prevention System, Safe Kids Colorado, the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment and the Children's Hospital Colorado.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles