Responses

Download PDFPDF
Imaging in suspected child abuse: necessity or radiation hazard?
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Imaging in suspected child abuse

    Monika Bajaj and Amaka Offiah are to be commended for their thoughtful and helpful review of the benefits and risks of skeletal imaging in cases of suspected child abuse.(1) The diagnosis of child abuse is a complex process which requires an evidence-informed approach combining clinical acumen with collaborative multi-agency working. Skeletal imaging, including CT scans, provide a valuable tool for the clinician, but,...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Re:The Skeletal Survey in suspected abuse- how necessary is it?
    • Amaka C Offiah, Reader, University of Sheffield
    • Other Contributors:
      • Monika Bajaj

    We thank Dr Cohn and his colleagues for their interest in our article and agree - as stated within our paper - that there is considerable variability in the reported fracture yield of skeletal surveys. This variability is not only dependent on methods of data display (as Dr Cohn et al illustrate), but also on epidemiological and demographic differences between reported study populations and on the process by which clinicia...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    The Skeletal Survey in suspected abuse- how necessary is it?
    • anthony cohn, Consultant paediatrican
    • Other Contributors:
      • Shaneil Patel, Adam Blackstock

    Drs Bajaj and Offiah present compelling reasons for performing skeletal surveys in all children under 2 years of age with unexplained injury, as recommended by the RCPCH guidelines. We have followed this practice for a number of years but an audit of our skeletal surveys came to a very different conclusion.

    We reviewed the results of the skeletal surveys requested in our hospital over a period of 7 years and 4...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.