Superior vena cava syndrome: treatment with catheter-directed thrombolysis and endovascular stent placement

Radiology. 1998 Jan;206(1):187-93. doi: 10.1148/radiology.206.1.9423671.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate use of catheter-directed thrombolysis and/or endovascular stent placement to treat superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome.

Materials and methods: Fifty-nine consecutive patients with SVC syndrome were studied. The cause was underlying malignancy in 43 and benign disease in 16. All patients underwent bilateral upper-extremity venography. The SVC was occluded in 31 cases and stenosed in 28. Twenty-seven patients underwent catheter-directed thrombolysis; 51 underwent endovascular stent placement. Patency was defined in terms of absence of symptoms and signs of SVC syndrome.

Results: Technical success was achieved in 56 of 59 patients (95%). Among 42 patients with underlying malignancy (mean follow-up, 7.0 months; range, 1-34 months), primary clinical patency was achieved in 33 (79%) and secondary clinical patency was achieved in 39 (93%). Among 13 patients with benign disease (mean follow-up, 17.0 months; range, 1-27 months), primary clinical patency was achieved in 10 (77%) and secondary clinical patency was achieved in 11 (85%). Four patients were lost to follow-up. Periprocedural mortality and morbidity rates were 3% (two of 59 patients) and 10% (six of 59 patients), respectively.

Conclusion: Catheter-directed thrombolysis and endovascular stent placement is a safe and effective treatment for SVC syndrome.

MeSH terms

  • Contraindications
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Plasminogen Activators / therapeutic use*
  • Radiology, Interventional
  • Stents*
  • Superior Vena Cava Syndrome / etiology
  • Superior Vena Cava Syndrome / therapy*
  • Thrombolytic Therapy / methods*
  • Time Factors
  • Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator / therapeutic use*
  • Vascular Patency

Substances

  • Plasminogen Activators
  • Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator