The presence of delayed gastric emptying in neurologically impaired children with gastroesophageal reflux has led to controversy regarding appropriate surgical management. The authors reviewed the charts of neurologically impaired children requiring fundoplication to answer two questions: (1) is pyloroplasty needed in addition to fundoplication for delayed gastric emptying? and (2) Does delayed gastric emptying influence the morbidity associated with fundoplication? To answer the first question, 40 neurologically impaired children with delayed gastric emptying undergoing fundoplication were divided into two groups: Nissen and pyloroplasty (n = 21) and Nissen only (n = 19). The Nissen and pyloroplasty group had significantly more postoperative complications (23.8% v 5.0%) and took longer to reach full feeding (14.6 v 3.9) days. There were no differences in the incidence of recurrent symptoms, readmissions, or reoperations. To answer the second question, 58 neurologically impaired children undergoing fundoplication were grouped based on gastric emptying scan results: normal gastric emptying (> 32% in 1 hour) (n = 29) and delayed gastric emptying (n = 29). There were no differences in postoperative feeding tolerance, postoperative complications, recurrent symptoms, readmissions, or reoperations between the two groups. Delayed gastric emptying in neurologically impaired children with gastroesophageal reflux did not increase postoperative morbidity after fundoplication, and the addition of a pyloroplasty to fundoplication provided no additional benefit. The authors conclude that the procedure of choice for neurologically impaired children with gastroesophageal reflux is a fundoplication without pyloroplasty, regardless of the degree of delay in gastric emptying.