Skip to main content

Community-based care vs. centralised hospitalisation for MDR-TB patients, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Buy Article:

$34.78 + tax (Refund Policy)

SETTING: KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, a predominantly rural province with a high burden of tuberculosis (TB), multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the most effective care model by comparing MDR-TB treatment outcomes at community-based sites with traditional care at a central, specialised hospital.

DESIGN: A non-randomised observational prospective cohort study comparing community-based and centralised care. Patients at community-based sites were closer to home and had easier access to care, and home-based care was available from treatment initiation.

RESULTS: Four community-based sites treated 736 patients, while 813 were treated at the centralised hospital (total = 1549 patients). Overall, 75% were HIV co-infected (community: 76% vs. hospitalised: 73%, P = 0.45) and 86% received antiretroviral therapy (community: 91% vs. hospitalised: 82%, P = 0.22). On multivariate analysis, MDR-TB patients were more likely to have a successful treatment outcome if they were treated at a community-based site (adjusted OR 1.43, P = 0.01). However, outcomes at the four community-based sites were heterogeneous, with Site 1 demonstrating that home-based care was associated with an increased treatment success of 72% compared with success rates of 52–60% at the other three sites.

CONCLUSION: Community-based care for MDR-TB patients was more effective than care in a central, specialised hospital. Home-based care further increased treatment success.

Keywords: HIV; models of care; outcomes

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa 2: TB and HIV Investigative Network (Think), Durban, South Africa 3: Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center & Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York, USA 4: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA 5: Discipline of Public Health Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa 6: KwaZulu-Natal Department of Health, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa 7: King Dinuzulu Hospital, Durban, South Africa 8: Harvard University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 9: Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa, Durban, South Africa

Publication date: 01 February 2015

More about this publication?
  • The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (IJTLD) is for clinical research and epidemiological studies on lung health, including articles on TB, TB-HIV and respiratory diseases such as COVID-19, asthma, COPD, child lung health and the hazards of tobacco and air pollution. Individuals and institutes can subscribe to the IJTLD online or in print – simply email us at [email protected] for details.

    The IJTLD is dedicated to understanding lung disease and to the dissemination of knowledge leading to better lung health. To allow us to share scientific research as rapidly as possible, the IJTLD is fast-tracking the publication of certain articles as preprints prior to their publication. Read fast-track articles.

  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
  • Public Health Action
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content