Am J Perinatol 1998; 15(8): 469-477
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-994068
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

© 1998 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.

Has The Outcome for Extremely Low Gestational Age (ELGA) Infants Improved Following Recent Advances in Neonatal Intensive Care?

Malcolm Battin1 , Emily W.Y. Ling1 , Michael F. Whitfield1 , Murray Mackinnon3 , Sidney B. Effer2
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, British Columbia's Children's Hospital and British Columbia's Women's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, British Columbia's Children's Hospital and British Columbia's Women's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • 3Research Support Services, University of British Columbia, British Columbia's Children's Hospital and British Columbia's Women's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 March 2008 (online)

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this paper are to examine (a) the survival of extremely low-gestational-age (ELGA) infants born at 23-28 weeks’ gestational age (GA) and (b) the neu-rodevelopmental outcome at 18 months corrected age for those born at 23-25 weeks’ GA during 1991-1993, when antenatal steroids, surfactant, and dexamethasone for bronchopulmonary dysplasia had become accepted treatments; and to compare with an earlier (1983-1989), previously published large cohort (in a presurfactant era) from our institution. Perinatal and neonatal data on all births delivered at 23-28 weeks’ GA at British Columbia's tertiary perinatal center were analyzed for survival rates by GA. Survivors of those born at 23-25 weeks’ GA underwent neurodevelopmental assessment at a corrected chronological age of 18 months. The recent cohort (n = 333) of live birth infants, compared to the earlier cohort (n = 911) showed a trend toward an overall improved survival to discharge (72 vs. 65%, p = 0.06). Further analysis showed that improved survival was seen only in 26- to 28-week GA infants (86 vs. 76%, p = 0.01), but not in 23- to 25-week GA infants (44 vs. 44%, p = 0.9), even when adjusted for gender or twin births. In addition, the incidence of major impairment at 18 months (36% in both periods) remained high. Reanalysis of 24- to 25-week GA infants again showed no evidence of improved survival (53 vs. 50%) or improved outcome at 18 months (major handicap rate 32%; vs. 34%). Survival rates improved for 26- to 28-week GA infants, but the survival rate and incidence of major impairment had not improved for of 23- to 25-week GA infants.

    >