Report
Typing and subtyping clinical isolates of influenza virus using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-0197(96)00254-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: Influenza virus infections are a major cause of morbidity and the identification of the type or subtype of a clinical isolate has important clinical and epidemiological implications.

Objectives: To evaluate the ability of a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay to type and subtype clinical human isolates of influenza virus.

Study design: Reference strains of influenza AH1N1, AH3N2, and B viruses and human clinical isolates of influenza virus representing antigenic variants from the last 15 years were evaluated using an RT-PCR assay.

Results: Amplicons of 325, 198 and 365 base pairs in length were obtained from RNA extracted from influenza AH1N1, AH3N2 and B viruses, respectively. All human-derived AH1N1, AH3N2, and B reference strains and antigenic variants tested were correctly identified.

Conclusions: RT-PCR is an effective alternative to traditional methods for typing and subtyping influenza viruses.

References (25)

  • E.C.J. Claas et al.

    Prospective application of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for diagnosing influenza infections in respiratory samples from a children's hospital

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (1993)
  • R.B. Couch et al.

    Influenza: its control in persons and populations

    J. Infect. Dis.

    (1986)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Influenza in the acute hospital setting

      2002, Lancet Infectious Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, the available rapid diagnostic tests vary in their performance characteristics according to assay type, sample type, time of sample collection, and age of the patient. When compared with influenza isolation, immunofluorescence assays are 50·90% sensitive for viral detection58–61 and enzyme immunoassays are 50–80% sensitive.62–65 In general, the sensitivity of rapid diagnostic tests is higher in children than adults and higher for nasal samples than throat specimens.59

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text