The multiple meanings of long-term gastrostomy in children with severe disability

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-5963(97)80029-2Get rights and content

Although the physiological implications of long-term gastrostomy for children with severe disability are well documented in the nursing literature, little is known about the psychosocial effect of this technological intervention. This study documents and interprets the perspective of expert nurses and parents to reveal conflictual social processes associated with gastrostomy decision-making and the intense moral dilemma that these processes create. The findings suggest that gastrostomy denotes multiple meanings for parents and health care providers, and that an appreciation for these meanings can have a significant positive impact on nursing care for these children and their families

References (25)

  • GaudererM.W.L. et al.

    Gastrostomies: Evolution, techniques, indications and complications

    Current Problems in Surgery

    (1986)
  • BrophyP.

    Commentary on caring for chronically ill children at home: Factors that influence parents' coping

    ONS Nursing Scan in Oncology

    (1994)
  • CohenM.H.

    The triggers of heightened parental uncertainty in chronic, life-threatening childhood illness

    Qualitative Health Research

    (1995)
  • GiorgiA.

    Phenomenology and psychological research

    (1985)
  • HuddlestonK.C. et al.

    Preparing families of children with gastrostomies

    Pediatric Nursing

    (1991)
  • HuddlestonK.C. et al.

    A button for gastrostomy feedings

    Maternal Child Nursing

    (1990)
  • HuthM.M. et al.

    The gastrostomy feeding button

    Pediatric Nursing

    (1987)
  • KnaflK.A. et al.

    Managing and analyzing qualitative data: A description of tasks, techniques, and materials

    Western Journal of Nursing Research

    (1988)
  • LiaschenkoJ.

    The moral geography of home care

    Advances in Nursing Science

    (1994)
  • LincolnY.S. et al.

    Naturalistic inquiry

    (1985)
  • LowenbergJ.S.

    Interpretive research methodology: Broadening the dialogue

    Advances in Nursing Science

    (1993)
  • MalkiT.A. et al.

    A prospective evaluation of the button gastrostomy in children

    Canadian Journal of Surgery

    (1991)
  • Cited by (41)

    • Shared Decision-Making about assistive technology for the child with Severe Neurologic Impairment

      2014, Pediatric Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      When attempting to meet nutritional goals with oral feeds in the context of oromotor dysfunction, families often used negative language, describing feeding as “torture” or “a battle.”39 However, other parents described the value of oral feedings as representing a “normal” life skill38,40 and as an important enjoyable sensory experience for their child.41 Gastrostomy tube placement represents a life-sustaining technology, and conversations about it invite consideration of big-picture goals, especially when the child’s medical condition is progressive rather than static.

    • The Impact of Child Tube Feeding on Maternal Emotional State and Identity: A Qualitative Meta-Analysis

      2012, Journal of Pediatric Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      This apparent contradiction can be partly explained by differences in methodology. Questionnaires requesting cursory data on social functioning and mental health status (Tawfik et al., 1997; Sullivan et al., 2004; Heyman et al., 2004) will necessarily produce results different from in-depth interviews (Thorne et al., 1997; Craig & Scambler, 2006). We may conclude from all the available data that tube feeding has positive and negative aspects for families.

    • Medical, surgical, and health outcomes of gastrostomy feeding

      2006, Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology
    • Psychodynamic Treatment for Infants with Feeding Tube Dependency

      2023, Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text