Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 355, Issue 9198, 8 January 2000, Pages 82-83
The Lancet

Commentary
Development of practice guidelines

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)90326-4Get rights and content

References (7)

  • Institute of Medicine

    Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use

    (1992)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council

    A guide to the development, implementation and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines

    (1999)
  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network

    SIGN guidelines: an introduction to SIGN methodology for the development of evidencebased clinical guidelines

    (1999)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (74)

  • ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery

    2017, Clinical Nutrition
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the case of inconsistent data the following approach was chosen. The recommendations were not only based on the evidence levels of the studies but also on the judgement of the working group concerning the consistency, clinical relevance and validity of the evidence [77]. For perioperative enteral and parenteral immunonutrition several systematic reviews and meta-analyses had been published in the past years.

  • Preamble: The Consensus Recommendations Process

    2008, Annals of Emergency Medicine
  • Analysis of the quality of clinical practice guidelines on established ischemic stroke

    2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text