Elsevier

Public Health

Volume 100, Issue 5, September 1986, Pages 316-324
Public Health

A method for the validation of data in a register

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3506(86)80054-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Epidemiological analysis is often constrained by uncertainties about the validity ofdata collected by population registers. A method is described whereby registered data are compared with reference data to establish the accuracy (item validity) and success (case validity) of ascertainment of a register. Case validation involved three methods of analysis: comparison with other registers, a ‘pooling’ method and a ‘screening’ method. This approach was applied to data recorded by the Glasgow Register of Congenital Malformations for the period 1972–77, the first six years of its operation. The results indicated a high degree of item validity (with the exception of maternal data) but a variable degree of case validity. In particular, the Register appeared poor at ascertaining defects which necessitated surgical repair. It is concluded that the method could provide a means of assessing the validity of other registers.

References (19)

  • McBrideW.G.

    Thalidomide and Congenital Abnormalities (Letter)

    Lancet

    (1961)
  • LeckI. et al.

    The Ascertainment of Malformations

    Lancet

    (1963)
  • GreggN.M.

    Congenital Cataract following German Measles in the Mother

    Transactions of the Ophthalmological Society of Australia

    (1941)
  • WeatherallJ.A.L. et al.

    Surveillance of Malformations

    British Medical Bulletin

    (1976)
  • McKeownT. et al.

    Malformations in a Population Observed for Five Years after Birth

  • SmithellsR.W.

    The Liverpool Congenital Abnormalities Registry

    Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology

    (1962)
  • RichardsI.D.G. et al.

    Incidence of Congenital Defects in South Wales, 1964–6

    British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine

    (1971)
  • SchaeferM.
  • BennettA.E. et al.
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (16)

  • Evaluation of a regional trauma registry

    2007, Canadian Journal of Surgery
  • Quality assessment of Major Trauma Registry of Navarra: completeness and correctness

    2019, International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion
  • Data quality in rare diseases registries

    2017, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text