Special article
Outcome studies of low birth weight infants published in the last decade: A metaanalysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(89)80273-2Get rights and content

We conducted a metaanalysis and methods review of 80 studies, published in the last decade, that explored the outcome of low birth weight infants; 27% involved infants whose birth weights were ≤2500 gm (low birth weight), 44%≤1500 gm (very low birth weight), and 29% ≤1000 gm (extremely low birth weight). Problems found in these studies were grouped into three categories: subject and methods issues, environmental factors, and outcome measurement. The combined average intelligence quotient/developmental quotient (IQ/DQ) of all low birth weight groups was 97.77 (SD 6.19); for control subjects the mean IQ/DQ was 103.78 (SD 8.16). This difference was statistically significant but perhaps not clinically significant. No differences in mean IQ/DQ scores were found among the low birth weight, very low birth weight, and extremely low birth weight subgroups. Statistically significant differences among all groups and control subjects were found when categoric data were analyzed, as were differences among the three subgroups; however, the variety of outcome criteria makes interpretation of the categoric analyses difficult.

References (31)

  • HackM et al.

    The low birthweight infant: evolution of changing outlook

    N Engl J Med

    (1979)
  • RossG

    Mortality and morbidity in very low birthweight infants

    Pediatr Ann

    (1983)
  • StewartAL et al.

    Outcome for infants of very low birthweight: survey of world literature

    Lancet

    (1981)
  • KitchenWH et al.

    Changing outcome over 13 years of very low birthweight infants

    Semin Perinatol

    (1982)
  • VohrBR et al.

    Neurodevelopmental and school performance of very low-birth-weight infants: a seven year longitudinal study

    Pediatrics

    (1985)
  • NickelRE et al.

    School performance of children with birth weights of 1000 g or less

    Am J Dis Child

    (1982)
  • EilersBL et al.

    Classroom performance and social factors of children with birth weights of 1250 grams or less: follow-up at 5 to 8 years of age

    Pediatrics

    (1986)
  • KleinN et al.

    Preschool performance of children with normal intelligence who were very low-birth-weight infants

    Pediatrics

    (1985)
  • AylwardGP

    Issues in prediction and developmental follow-up

    J Dev Behav Pediatr

    (1988)
  • WilliamsonJW et al.

    The quality of medical literature: an analysis of validation assessments

  • GlassGV

    Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research

    Educ Res

    (1976)
  • GlassGV et al.

    Meta-analysis in social research

    (1981)
  • CohenJ

    Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

    (1976)
  • HollingsheadAB

    Four-Factor Index of Social Status: working paper

    (1975)
  • JonesB

    Impairment, disability, and handicap

    Child Care Health Dev

    (1987)
  • Cited by (320)

    • Testing a cascade model linking prenatal inflammation to child executive function

      2022, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease [1] and fetal origins [2] hypotheses predict that prenatal conditions may have lasting effects on child health and developmental outcomes. Researchers testing these hypotheses have found that specific at-risk groups of children, such as children born low birthweight (LBW) and/or preterm (PT), are at increased risk for a host of neurodevelopmental difficulties, including low IQ and poor executive function as well as increased risk for ADHD, internalizing and externalizing behavior problems, and autism spectrum disorders [3–6]. Beyond broad proxies for adverse prenatal experiences, researchers have started to examine specific risk factors within the prenatal environment that are related to individual differences in child neurodevelopment.

    • A Brief Measure of Language Skills at 3 Years of Age and Special Education Use in Middle Childhood

      2017, Journal of Pediatrics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, there is potential that early identification of risk leads to intervention and positive developmental outcomes. A limitation of this study was the lack of access to family history of communication difficulties and lack of information about perinatal factors, such as prematurity status and low birth weight, all of which have been shown to be related to later communication difficulties.26-28 Yet, although examination of risk factors is important, such factors should not be the central focus when one is examining screening tools and improving screening methods.

    • Individual Differences and Personality

      2017, Individual Differences and Personality
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text