Conference proceeding

The primary care provider's role in caring for young people with chronic illness

This is an analysis of important aspects of health equity in caring for children and adolescents written by a multidisciplinary team from different medical centers. In this discussion for clinicians, we look at definitions of pediatric health equity and the enormous impact of social determinants of health in this area. Factors involved with pediatric healthcare disparities that are considered include race, ethnicity, gender, age, poverty, socioeconomic status, LGBT status, living in rural communities, housing instability, food insecurity, access to transportation, availability of healthcare professionals, the status of education, and employment as well as immigration. Additional issues involved with health equity in pediatrics that are reviewed will include the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, behavioral health concepts, and the negative health effects of climate change. Recommendations that are presented include reflection of one's own attitudes on as well as an understanding of these topics, consideration of the role of various healthcare providers (i.e., community health workers, peer health navigators, others), the impact of behavioral health integration, and the need for well-conceived curricula as well as multi-faceted training programs in pediatric health equity at the undergraduate and postgraduate medical education levels. Furthermore, ongoing research in pediatric health equity is needed to scrutinize current concepts and stimulate the development of ideas with an ever-greater positive influence on the health of our beloved children. Clinicians caring for children can serve as champions for the optimal health of children and their families; in addition, these healthcare professionals are uniquely positioned in their daily work to understand the drivers of health inequities and to be advocates for optimal health equity in the 21st century for all children and adolescents.

Life expectancy for adolescents with SCD now extends well into adulthood. As a result, adolescents transfer to adult care. Little empirical evidence exists to show how transfer occurs and how well the current practices now work. The aim of this study was to obtain a database on the experience of adolescents/young adults with SCD that transfer to adult care. We assessed their treatment compliance, independence, and whether they receive uninterrupted care. Data were obtained through patient and provider interviews and patient record reviews. Results indicate patients leave pediatric care without adequate transfer preparation and readiness to transfer is not the major consideration in the decision to transfer, follow-up often ceases once the patients leave pediatric care, and patients who maintain follow-up appointments are more efficient in managing their illness (self-efficacy). The model for a structured transitioning process is provided with recommendations for nurse case managers to maintain follow-up. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.