Career development in academic medicine

doi:10.1016/0002-9343(90)90152-4

The American Journal of Medicine

Volume 88, Issue 3, March 1990, Pages 263-267

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(90)90152-4 Get rights and content

Abstract

Clinical academic medicine desperately needs the continued infusion of talented young academicians, but many young faculty are not pursuing strategies that optimize their chances for academic survival. Many junior faculty are overburdened with clinical demands and do not have a well-focused research agenda. Such situations will hinder the full development of many talented young persons. In order to optimize chances for success, young faculty should clearly define their goals, carefully negotiate the terms of their employment, practice sound principles of time management, identify a mentor, and develop a focused research agenda.

References (10)

B Healey
Innovators for the 21st century: will we face a crisis in biomedical research brainpower?
N Engl J Med
(1988)
WN Kelley
Personnel needs for clinical research: role of the clinical investigator
Clin Res
(1985)
EM Short
The unexamined life
Clin Res
(1983)
WR Hazzard
Academic gerontology: on the aging of academicians
Clin Res
(1983)
EL Schneider et al.
Geriatrics and gerontology: imperatives in education and training
Ann Intern Med
(1986)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (68)

The ABCs of Career Development
2024, American Journal of Medicine
Academic career development: A review and research agenda
2019, Journal of Vocational Behavior
Citation Excerpt :
In this regard, a study suggested that the decision to take a sabbatical could take academic careers into new directions (Carraher, Crocitto, & Sullivan, 2014). Another article argued that early-career academics need to define clear goals, carefully negotiate their employment terms, and use time management strategies to optimize their chances of success (Applegate & Williams, 1990). As part of a career development workshop, du Plooy and Vansteenkiste (2012) introduced a concept called “career sculpting,” which refers to “the creative involvement of individuals in the shaping of their own lives and careers” (p. 89).
Academic career development refers to the process by which employers as well as scholars working in research, teaching, and/or administrative roles in academic and higher education contexts manage various tasks, behaviors, and experiences within and across jobs and organizations over time, with implications for scholars' work-related identity. In this review article, we address the question: to what extent has conceptual and empirical research on academic career development captured central constructs and processes outlined by two important and comprehensive career development theories? Using social cognitive career theory and life-span, life-space theory as guiding frameworks, we categorized relevant articles published in academic journals into five thematic clusters: (a) individual characteristics, (b) contextual factors, (c) active regulation of behavior, (d) career stages, and (e) work and nonwork roles. Within these thematic clusters, major topics in the existing literature on academic career development include gender differences and women's experiences, mentoring and other career development interventions, and career development in the field of medicine. In contrast, social and cognitive processes, action regulation, later career stages, and the work-nonwork interface have been neglected in the literature on academic career development. We conclude by outlining an agenda for future research, including theoretical and methodological considerations.
Decreasing Barriers to Academic Rank for Advanced Practice Providers
2017, Journal for Nurse Practitioners
Citation Excerpt :
Many NP/PAs commented that the more they learned about the academic rank process the more they realized that with their current clinical demand they had limited time to dedicate to this endeavor. Again, organizing dedicated, mentored time to assist with the publication process required for rank achievement could allow more opportunity for advanced practice providers to overcome this barrier.11 While performing the one-on-one mentoring sessions, we noted a lack of an effective measurement tool for evaluating “perceived knowledge improvement.”
The aim of this study was to reduce barriers to achieving academic promotion among advanced practice providers. Educational sessions, an online tutorial, and mentoring sessions were implemented. A survey was administered to all advanced providers after the interventions. Of the 168 surveys sent out, 117 (67%) were returned. Subsequently, 32% achieved academic rank (a 52% improvement), and 35% were active in the process. Reporting of the most frequently identified barriers “lack of mentorship” and “difficulty understanding the process” was reduced by 100% and 71%. Strategies to decrease barriers can be beneficial in improving the processes and achievement of academic promotion.
Multi-institutional study of women and underrepresented minority faculty members in academic pharmacy
2012, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
To examine trends in the numbers of women and underrepresented minority (URM) pharmacy faculty members over the last 20 years, and determine factors influencing women faculty members’ pursuit and retention of an academic pharmacy career.
Twenty-year trends in women and URM pharmacy faculty representation were examined. Women faculty members from 9 public colleges and schools of pharmacy were surveyed regarding demographics, job satisfaction, and their academic pharmacy career, and relationships between demographics and satisfaction were analyzed.
The number of women faculty members more than doubled between 1989 and 2009 (from 20.7% to 45.5%), while the number of URM pharmacy faculty members increased only slightly over the same time period. One hundred fifteen women faculty members completed the survey instrument and indicated they were generally satisfied with their jobs. The academic rank of professor, being a nonpharmacy practice faculty member, being tenured/tenure track, and having children were associated with significantly lower satisfaction with fringe benefits. Women faculty members who were tempted to leave academia for other pharmacy sectors had significantly lower salary satisfaction and overall job satisfaction, and were more likely to indicate their expectations of academia did not match their experiences (p<0.05).
The significant increase in the number of women pharmacy faculty members over the last 20 years may be due to the increased number of female pharmacy graduates and to women faculty members’ satisfaction with their careers. Lessons learned through this multi-institutional study and review may be applicable to initiatives to improve recruitment and retention of URM pharmacy faculty members.
Resident Research Forums Stimulate Novel Research Within General Surgical Training Programs
2009, Journal of Surgical Education
Citation Excerpt :
These services have been added for residents since the creation of RRD. Although lack of time was cited by programs in our survey and is commonly reported as a barrier to resident research productivity,8,12,13 the importance of protected time in other disciplines has not been independently associated with an increase in research productivity among residents.13-15 We did find in our survey of general surgery residency programs that programs in which most residents spent at least 1 year in dedicated research had a greater percentage of residents participating in their resident research programs.
Our surgery residency includes an annual Resident Research Day (RRD) for presentation of resident research. We hypothesized that RRD stimulates the development of novel research. We evaluated this among our residents and at other institutions.
An electronic survey was distributed to current and alumni residents at our institution. The survey questions addressed residents' perceptions of RRD and were graded on a 5-point Likert scale. Another electronic survey was distributed to Program Directors (PDs) or Associate Program Directors (APDs) for all U.S. general surgery residencies. Questions assessed type of RRD and impact on research productivity. Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington) and MedCalc (MedCalc Software, Inc, Mariakerke, Belgium) software were used for analyses.
The response rate was 76% (47/62) among residents and alumni. These 47 respondents submitted 98 projects to RRD, which included retrospective clinical studies (53%), basic science (35%), medical education research (6%), and prospective clinical papers (6%). Twenty projects (20%) were created expressly for RRD, of which 7 were presented at outside scientific meetings and 8 were published in peer-reviewed journals. The response rate was 47% among PD/APD (88/188). Most programs have an RRD or similar forum (78%) without difference between university and community programs (p = 0.78). Higher rates of resident submission were associated with dedicated research time for most residents (p = 0.01). Required submission was associated with novel projects created for RRD (p < 0.001). Thirty-seven percent of programs reported greater than 25% of submitted projects were created for RRD.
RRD and similar forums occur at most general surgery training programs. They stimulate research activity and satisfy most residents' expectations. RRD leads to completion of novel research projects that are presented both internally and in peer-reviewed form.
Assessing the pediatric subspecialty pipeline: it is all about the data source
2023, Pediatric Research

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Special articleCareer development in academic medicine

Abstract

Innovators for the 21st century: will we face a crisis in biomedical research brainpower?

N Engl J Med

Personnel needs for clinical research: role of the clinical investigator

Clin Res

The unexamined life

Clin Res

Academic gerontology: on the aging of academicians

Clin Res

Geriatrics and gerontology: imperatives in education and training

Ann Intern Med

Special article
Career development in academic medicine