Skip to main content
Log in

Urography versus DMSA scan in children with vesicoureteric reflux

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following the diagnosis of primary vesicoureteric reflux, identified as part of the investigation of urinary tract infection, 299 refluxing kidneys in 202 children (aged 0–14 years) were prospectively evaluated using intravenous urography (IVU) and the DMSA renal scan at least 4 weeks after urine infection. There was 88% concordance between IVU and the DMSA scan, but in 12% there were discrepancies manifested in 37 kidneys from 31 children. Thirty-four kidneys were normal on IVU but showed scars of reflux nephropathy (RN) on the technetium 99m-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) renal scan; 4 of these (2 infants and 2 pre-school children) had severe generalized changes on scanning. Three kidneys were normal of DMSA scan and, although abnormal on initial IVU, were considered to be normal when this was repeated. During a followup period of 5 years an annual DMSA was undertaken in 194 patients and the renal scars remained unchanged in all except 1 child. The IVU was repeated 1–3 years after the initial study in 31 children in which the results of the first imaging did not agree. In 28 patients (34 kidneys) in which the initial IVU was normal but the DMSA abnormal, IVU evidence of scarring emerged in 30 of 34 kidneys, including the 4 patients with severe generalized damage on the DMSA. We conclude that abnormalities detected by the DMSA scan may precede the radiological findings, especially in young children. Even severe RN can be established in kidneys that appear normal on the IVU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bailey RR (1973) The relationship of vesico-ureteric reflux to urinary tract infection and chronic pyelonephritisreflux nephropathy. Clin Nephrol 1: 132–141

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hugosson CO, Chrispin AR, Wolverson MK (1976) The advent of the pyelonephritic scar. Ann Radiol 19:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  3. Filly RA, Friedland GW, Govan DE, Fair WR (1974) Development and progression of clubbing and scarring in children with recurrent urinary tract infection. Radiology 113: 145–153

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lin TH, Khentigan A, Winchell HS (1974) A99mTc-chelate substitute for organoradiomercurial renal agents. J Nucl Med 15: 34–35

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldraich NP, Goldraich IH, Anselmi OE, Ludwig EB, Ramos OL (1983) Assessment of individual renal function with DMSA renal scan in children with primary vesicoureteric reflux. Eur J Pediatr 140: 212

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gordon I (1987) Indications for99mtechnetium-dimercaptosuccinic acid scan in children. J Urol 137: 464–467

    Google Scholar 

  7. Joekes AM, Constable AR, Brown NJG, Tauxe WN (1982) Radionuclides in nephrology. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hodson CJ (1964) Pyelonephritis in children. Ann Radiol 7: 355–359

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goldraich NP, Goldraich IH, Anselmi OE, Ramos OL (1984) Reflux nephropathy: the clinical picture in South Brazilian children. Contrib Nephrol 39: 52–67

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smellie JM, Edwards D, Hunter N, Normand ICS, Prescod N (1975) Vesico-ureteric reflux and renal scarring. Kidney Int 8: s65-s72

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goldraich IH, Goldraich NP, Ramos OL (1983) Classification of reflux nephropathy according to findings at DMSA renal scan. Eur J Pediatr 140: 212

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hodson CJ, Wilson S (1965) Natural history of chronic pyelonephritic scarring. Br Med J 2: 191–194

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stoller ML, Kogan BA (1986) Sensitivity of99mtechnetium-dimercaptosuccinic acid for the diagnosis of chronic pyelonephritis: clinical and theoretical considerations. J Urol 135: 977–980

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goldraich NP, Alvarenga AR, Goldraich IH, Ramos OL, Sigulem D (1985) Renal accumulation of99mTc-DMSA in the artificially perfused isolated rat kidney. J Urol 134: 1282–1286

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goldraich NP, Goldraich IH (1982) Reflux nephropathy: assessment using DMSA renal uptake. Int J Pediatr Nephrol 3: 120

    Google Scholar 

  16. Merrick MV, Uttley WS, Wild SR (1980) The detection of pyelonephritic scarring in children by radioisotope imaging. Br J Radiol 53: 544–556

    Google Scholar 

  17. Handmaker H, Young BW, Fay R (1979) Nuclear renal imaging in acute pyelonephritis. J Nucl Med 20: 623

    Google Scholar 

  18. Van Luijk WHJ, Ensing GJ, Meijer S, Donker AJM, Piers DA (1984) Is the relative99mTc-DMSA clearance a useful marker of proximal tubular dysfunction?, Eur J Nucl Med 9: 439–442

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goldraich NP, Yan A, Shah V, Goldraich IH, Dillon MJ, Barratt TM (1987)99mTc-DMSA urinary excretion: a new test to assess tubular function. Abstracts, Xth International Congress of Nephrology, London, p 64

  20. Provoost AP, Van Aken M (1985) Renal handling of technetium-99m DMSA in rats with proximal tubular dysfunction. J Nucl Med 26: 1063–1067

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goldraich, N.P., Ramos, O.L. & Goldraich, I.H. Urography versus DMSA scan in children with vesicoureteric reflux. Pediatr Nephrol 3, 1–5 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00859614

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00859614

Key words

Navigation