Table 4

Comparison of the childhood FNA series

SeriesNo.SexAgeFNA resultsOverall malignancy rateStatistical analysis
MFBenignMalignSuspiciousInsufficientSenSpAccPPVNPV
Arda et al 469 (19%)37 (81%)938 (82%)3 (7%)3 (7%)2 (4%)7%100%95%95%67%100%
Al-Shaikhet al 17 4135 (85%)6 (15%)1330 (73%)2 (5%)6 (15%)3 (7%)5%87%100%87%29%100%
Khuranaet al 16 5711 (19%)46 (81%)1736 (63%)7 (12%)14 (25%)025%93%81%84%62%97%
Lugo-Vicente et al 15 244 (%17)20 (83%)1511 (61%)2 (11%)2 (11%)3 (17%)21%60%90%80%75%81%
Degnanet al 14 184 (22%)14 (78%)147 (41%)2 (12%)7 (41%)1 (6%)33%73%80%75%89%57%
Raabet al 13 578 (14%)49 (86%)1351 (77%)4 (6%)8 (12%)3 (5%)18%80%86%85%36%98%
  • No., number of patients; M, male; F, female; Sen, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; Acc, accuracy; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.