Table 3

Reduced optimality. Number (%) of subjects with particular background factor

DAMP
(n = 62)
Comparison (n = 51)Odds ratio (CI)p value
Social factors
Ethnicity—immigrant6 (10)5 (10)1.0 (0.2 to 4.4)0.767
Family structure—divorced19 (31)8 (16)2.4 (0.9 to 6.9)0.102
Social class
I4 (7)9 (18)
 II12 (19)22 (43)
 III46 (74)20 (39)4.5 (1.9 to 10.7)< 0.001
 Mean (SD)2.7 (0.6)2.2 (0.7)< 0.0001
Familial reduced optimality factors2-150
Speech/language retardation8 (13)1 (2)7.7 (0.9 to 348.0)0.037
Learning disorder23 (38)9 (18)2.9 (1.1 to 8.0)0.029
Motor clumsiness20 (33)6 (12)3.8 (1.3 to 12.4)0.014
Left handedness16 (27)15 (29)0.9 (0.4 to 2.2)0.913
Mental retardation or epilepsy5 (8)1 (2)4.5 (0.5 to 215.3)0.217
Tics6 (10)8 (16)0.6 (0.2 to 2.1)0.540
Attention deficit10 (17)3 (6)3.2 (0.8 to 19.0)0.137
Presence of one or more reduced optimality familial factors49 (80)3l (61)2.6 (1.1 to 6.7)0.038
  • 2-150 Two boys with DAMP were either living with foster parents or were adopted, and information about their family background was not obtained except one of the boys had a mother and brother with epilepsy.