Analysis of factors affecting the variability of fick versus indicator dilution measurements of cardiac output

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(85)91132-4Get rights and content

Abstract

This study was performed to assess the relation between Fick and indicator dilution measurements of cardiac output (CO) in a large number of subjects and to evaluate this relation in patients with a low CO, a high CO, and left-sided cardiac regurgitation. In 808 patients (428 men, 380 women, mean age 50 ± 11), CO was measured by Fick and either thermodilution (right atrium to pulmonary artery (n = 252) or indocyanine green dye (“dye”) (pulmonary artery to systemic artery) (n = 556) within 10 minutes of each other. There was excellent agreement between Fick and both thermodilution and dye. The difference between Fick and indicator dilution measurements was 9 ± 9%; it was 10% or less in 67% and 20% or less in 91% of patients. The disparity between Fick and indicator dilution measurements was increased in patients with a low CO (less than 2 liters/min/m2) (n = 152) (difference 14 ± 11%, p < 0.001) and those with aortic or mitral regurgitation (n = 83) (difference 13 ± 11%, p < 0.001). In these groups, the disparity between Fick and thermodilution measurements was not exaggerated, but the disparity between Fick and dye measurements was greater. Thus, although there is excellent agreement between Fick and both thermodilution and dye measurements of CO, thermodilution is preferable to dye in patients with a low CO and those with aortic or mitral regurgitation.

References (16)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (121)

  • Comparison of Accuracy of Estimation of Cardiac Output by Thermodilution Versus the Fick Method Using Measured Oxygen Uptake

    2022, American Journal of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The TD method is often performed in concert with indirect Fick Q̇C measurements, and TD recently was shown in a large observational cohort to predict mortality more accurately as compared with the indirect Fick method.15 However, there are few previous studies comparing the accuracy of the TD method versus the gold standard Direct Fick method, where agreement between the 2 methods demonstrated acceptable correlation (R > 0.8),16–18 including in a subset of patients with pulmonary hypertension, severe tricuspid regurgitation and low Q̇C.18 This larger study cohort contrasts with these findings indicating the potential error of TD measurements when compared with the Fick method.

  • Resting Oxygen Consumption and Heart Failure: Importance of Measurement for Determination of Cardiac Output With the Use of the Fick Principle

    2020, Journal of Cardiac Failure
    Citation Excerpt :

    In that study, Td CO better predicted mortality.33 Given the importance of CO in the clinical decision making and management of patients with HF, the potential inaccuracy of Td CO introduced by TR and low CO, both of which are often present in end-stage HF, remains a concern.2–5 In addition, it does not appear that using Td-derived VO2 is preferential because it also overestimated VO2 in this HF population.

  • Pediatric Interventional Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

    2018, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Companion to Braunwald’s Heart Disease
  • Cardiac Outputs and Shunts

    2017, Textbook of Clinical Hemodynamics, Second Edition
  • Advanced imaging tools rather than hemodynamics should be the primary approach for diagnosing, following, and managing pulmonary arterial hypertension

    2015, Canadian Journal of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although O2 consumption can be measured accurately, that measurement is cumbersome, and many laboratories use standard tables for an assumed value instead of direct measurements. Such estimation may cause an error of as much as 40% in the assessment of CO.9 Most laboratories now use thermodilution based on an indicator dilution methodology to measure CO.10 When compared with the direct Fick method, thermodilution measurements show little bias, with a mean difference of 0.1 L/min and a confidence interval of 0.2 L/min, corresponding to excellent accuracy even in the presence of tricuspid regurgitation, but limits of agreement are ± 1 L/min, corresponding to moderate precision.11 Clinically significant information is gained from RHC that helps guide decisions.

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

Dr. Hillis is an Established Investigator of the American Heart Association, Dallas, Texas.

View full text