Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

other Versions

PDF
Dilemmas in undertaking research in paediatric intensive care
  1. Hari Krishnan Kanthimathinathan1,
  2. Barnaby R Scholefield2
  1. 1Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, UK
  2. 2Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Barnaby R Scholefield, Consultant Paediatric Intensivist, Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham B4 6NH, UK; barney.scholefield{at}bch.nhs.uk

Abstract

Providing evidence-based interventions for infants and children is important in paediatric intensive care, where decision making impacts most acutely on morbidity and mortality. However, despite the major progress of medicine in the 21st century, we still lack this evidence for majority of the decisions we make. In this article, we explore and suggest possible solutions for several dilemmas faced by paediatric intensive care researchers. These include ethical dilemmas such as validity of informed consent, use of deferred consent, balancing risk versus benefit and methodological dilemmas such as how to generate high-quality evidence with low-patient volume, choice of valid outcome measures and how best to use research and researchers’ networks.

  • Intensive Care
  • Paediatric Practice
  • Evidence Based Medicine
  • Ethics
  • consent

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Atoms
    R Mark Beattie
  • Clarification
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health