Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Inattention in very preterm children: implications for screening and detection
  1. Ellen Brogan1,
  2. Lucy Cragg2,
  3. Camilla Gilmore3,
  4. Neil Marlow4,
  5. Victoria Simms5,6,
  6. Samantha Johnson5
  1. 1Leicester Children's Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
  2. 2School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  3. 3Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
  4. 4Research Department of Academic Neonatology, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
  5. 5Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  6. 6School of Psychology, University of Ulster, Coleraine, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Samantha Johnson, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 22–28 Princess Road West, Leicester, LE1 6TP, UK; sjj19{at}le.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective Children born very preterm (VP; <32 weeks) are at risk for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorders (ADHD). ADHD in VP children have a different clinical presentation to ADHD in the general population, and therefore VP children with difficulties may not come to the teacher's attention in school. We have assessed ADHD symptoms to determine whether VP children's difficulties may go undetected in the classroom.

Design Parents and teachers of 117 VP and 77 term-born children completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire to assess hyperactivity/inattention, emotional, conduct and peer problems, and the Du Paul ADHD Rating Scale-IV to assess inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms. Special Educational Needs (SEN) were assessed using teacher report. Group differences in outcomes were adjusted for socio-economic deprivation.

Results Parents and teachers rated VP children with significantly higher mean Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire hyperactivity/inattention scores, and parents rated them with more clinically significant hyperactivity/inattention difficulties than term-born controls (Relative Risk (RR) 4.0; 95% CI 1.4 to 11.4). Examining ADHD dimensions, parents and teachers rated VP children with significantly more inattention symptoms than controls, and parents rated them with more clinically significant inattention (RR 4.8; 95% CI 1.4 to 16.0); in contrast, there was no excess of hyperactivity/impulsivity. After excluding children with SEN, VP children still had significantly higher inattention scores than controls but there was no excess of hyperactivity/impulsivity.

Conclusions VP children are at greater risk for symptoms of inattention than hyperactivity/impulsivity. Inattention was significantly increased among VP children without identified SEN suggesting that these problems may be difficult to detect in school. Raising teachers’ awareness of inattention problems may be advantageous in enabling them to identify VP children who may benefit from intervention.

  • Child Psychology
  • General Paediatrics
  • Neonatology
  • Neurodevelopment
  • Psychology

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Atoms
    R Mark Beattie