Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

other Versions

PDF
Psychometric profile of children with auditory processing disorder and children with dyslexia
  1. Piers Dawes1,
  2. Dorothy V M Bishop2
  1. 1Department of Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  2. 2Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Piers Dawes, Audiology and Deafness Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; piers.dawes{at}manchester.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective The aim was to address the controversy that exists over the extent to which auditory processing disorder (APD) is a separate diagnostic category with a distinctive psychometric profile, rather than a reflection of a more general learning disability.

Methods Children with an APD diagnosis (N=25) were compared with children with dyslexia (N=19) on a battery of standardised auditory processing, language, literacy and non-verbal intelligence quotient measures as well as parental report measures of communicative skill and listening behaviour. A follow-up of a subset of children included a parent report screening questionnaire for Asperger syndrome (Childhood Asperger Syndrome Test).

Results There were similarly high levels of attentional, reading and language problems in both groups. One peculiarity of the APD group was a discrepancy between parental report of poor communication and listening skill disproportionate to expectations based on standardised test performance. Follow-up assessment suggested high levels of previously unrecognised autistic features within the APD group.

Conclusions Children diagnosed by audiological experts as having APD are likely to have broader neurodevelopmental disorders and would benefit from evaluation by a multidisciplinary team.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding Deafness Research UK, 330–332 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8EE.

  • Competing interest None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Patient consent Obtained from the parents.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by the Oxfordshire REC B, University of Oxford Ethics Committee.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Electronic pages
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health